Time to face global warming

A partly submerged Invercargill in 1984. Could this be a fate in store for cities such as Dunedin, London and Shanghai? Photo from ODT files.
A partly submerged Invercargill in 1984. Could this be a fate in store for cities such as Dunedin, London and Shanghai? Photo from ODT files.
How are Dunedin and Otago's civic leaders preparing the city and province for the encroaching challenges of climate change?

Not very well, argues Jocelyn Harris.

"Council forecasts show debt rising to $354 million in 2010-11, largely due to planned borrowing to pay for big-ticket infrastructure items and the planned $198 million Otago Stadium," reports the Otago Daily Times.

Council staff, it says, "have already highlighted the effects of the spending plans, leaving little room for additional expenditure of the 10-year period" (13.3.09).

That means that there will be no money to stave off climate change over the next 10 years, or to deal with its effects.

Likewise, an editorial in the ODT says the Otago Regional Council is displaying "extravagant and worrying attitudes" about its "vanity project", the planned $30.4 million harbourside building.

"Spending on the building will mean less money available for other purposes", it says (19.3.09).

Those purposes must include sewerage and water, to be sure, but the most imperative of all is how to respond to climate change.

I'm no scientist, but it's easy enough to find out what's going on.

Stories about climate change appear almost every day in the ODT, the Listener, Time, the Guardian Weekly, the New Scientist and other reputable journals.

Some models predict that the planet will be cooked as early as 2050.

We cannot simply avert our eyes from the bad news.

Five-year-olds will only be 45 when the world as we know it comes to an end.

How can we protect the next generation from the worst effects of climate change?

Where is the sense of urgency among our civic leaders, who have the power and the money to take effective action?

Here are some recent headlines plucked pretty much at random.

On March 10, the ODT published an article about respected scientist James Lovelock.

Climate change, he says, will wipe out most life on Earth by the end of this century, and mankind is too late to avert catastrophe.

Higher temperatures will turn parts of the world into desert and raise sea levels, flooding other regions.

Crop failures, drought, and death on an unprecedented scale could cause the population of the world to shrink from about seven billion to one billion by 2100 as people compete for ever-scarcer resources.

Efforts should therefore be focused, he says, on creating safe havens in areas which will escape the worst effects of climate change.

The good news is that leading scientific journal New Scientist says that those areas include New Zealand.

But the bad news is that some models predict that the planet will be 4degC warmer as soon as 2050, well within the lifetimes of our children and their children (28.2.08).

"Climate guru calls for `drastic action'," writes Robin Mackie in The Observer (21.1.09).

Jim Hansen, a distinguished climatologist, has pinned photographs of his three grandchildren to his office wall.

They remind him of his duty to future generations, children he believes are threatened by a global greenhouse catastrophe that is soaring out of control because of soaring carbon dioxide emissions from industry and transport.

Barack Obama's administration, says Hansen, offers the world the last chance to make things right.

If it fails, global disaster - melted ice caps, flooded cities, species extinction and spreading deserts - awaits mankind.

Coal-burning power-plants he especially singles out as factories of death.

So how can we eliminate all coal-burning heating plants in Dunedin?"

Melting glaciers imperil world's water," says the Sunday Star-Times (18.2.09).

Nearly 2 billion people in Asia will suffer water shortages as global warming shrinks glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau.

Temperatures in high-altitude Tibet rose by 0.32degC every 10 years between 1961 and 2007, well above the world and national average, says a report in the ODT (9.3.09).

Meanwhile, down in the Antarctic, more rain is speeding glacier melt and nudging up world sea levels, which could exceed 150cm this century, says the Guardian Weekly (2.01.09).

That would swamp many major cities of the world, as well as low-lying parts of Dunedin.

What would make Dunedin's leaders care enough to act? "Earth teeters at its physical limit," says John Vidal in the Guardian Weekly (19.12.08).

Last year, he writes, it may have dawned on governments that hell-for-leather, Western fossil-fuel-based, car-centred growth only ends in social and ecological disaster.

The drop in oil prices may give us a chance to "climate-proof" our economies, says Vidal. But is it too late?

Time to face global warming

OK, Councillors - just for starters, what's the CO2 cost of the stadium likely to be, to the nearest order of magnitude?

With this gratuitous use of an enormous amount of concrete, the DCC is not only thumbing its nose at Dunedin ratepayers, but saying "up yours" to the rest of the world as well.

wow

In other words, when the climate is tropical colder weather is a normal manifestation. Quite understandable and when the colder climatic regions have even colder weather, it has nothing to do with the weather at all, it's the climate you see? How absolutely simple and why people do not grasp that basic principle, is beyond me.

Climate variation

The previous poster was exactly right when they commented on seasonal variations. That is the expected effect of climate change, and is what we see today. Those countries, such as in northern Europe, who experience large temperature and climatic variations between summer and winter are finding that the difference between those two seasons is increasing. England is an example where they have come through a near record extreme winter, preceeded by near record extreme summer. The difference decreases as one moves closer to the temperate climatic zones. New Zealand is in a very fortunate position as there is no great seasonal variation. Thus, the effect of climate change directly affecting New Zealand as a land mass is relatively minor. Compared to those extreme nations. Obviously though, the changes in needs from those countries will effect New Zealand, in areas such as energy fuel requirements or food sources. So climate change effects, while not visible to us, should be very real to us. And not ignored.

Limits to understanding

According to recent National Science Foundation Survey data, 29% of Americans and 34% of Europeans still think the sun goes around the earth – probably not much chance of them understanding climate change! I think we overestimate people's understanding of basic information about the physical world, let alone their ability to evaluate the validity of the prevailing international scientific view.

Glacier depletion

Can someone measure two things for me please:
1. The rate of depletion of Drift Glacier in Alaska due to increased CO2 emissions.
2. The rate of depletion of Drift Glacier due to the recent eruption of Mt Redoubt.

Wow

There are still people who believe that weather and climate are the same thing. Climate is long term patterns and weather is short term - day to day yes but also seasonal.
Global average temperatures are still well up on historic averages. And in case you missed the memo: climate change in addition to making the average long term temperature trend upwards will also have the effect of increasing the variation between summer and winter.
In other words: "Global warming will make winter's weather worse"

My glasshouse

If global warming is being discredited (no source given) maybe I had better take the roof off my glasshouse. This will let the sun in more easily, and it will become warmer . . .

What global warming?

The predicted increased temperatures are not happening. Since 1998, global average temperatures have been going down, and this trend is confirmed by the current unusually cold Northern Hemisphere winter. The global warming theory is becoming increasingly discredited.