Who's not using their loaves in debate over folate?

Katherine RichThere are a number of things to be said about the successful campaign to abort - and I use the term advisedly - the planned mandatory supplementation of bread with the vitamin folic acid.

Not least among these is that it was a text-book example of political lobbying, for which former Dunedin National list MP Katherine Rich, now chief executive of the food and grocery council, can take a good deal of credit.

Her political savvy, connections and familiarity with the media - together with the canny agenda-setting of the campaign - indicate just how effortlessly she has adapted to her new role.

It is also a reflection of how similar, in this day and age, are the skills required by politicians and public relations operatives: indeed the more cynical observer might say they are almost entirely interchangeable.

But let's back up a little and rehearse some of the history of this affair. A campaign has been waged for 20 years or so to have folic acid (or folate) added back to the bread from which the natural folate content is stripped during flour milling.

This followed proof that it was possible to reduce the incidence of neural tube defects (NTDs) - of which spina bifida is the most common instance - with vitamin supplementation.

It is of greatest consequence to women of child-bearing age who perhaps do not have the best or most balanced of diets, and to some of those for whom pregnancy is an inevitability, rather than a lifestyle choice.

The previous Labour-led government, and the National Party in opposition, supported the initiative and it was given added impetus by a joint transtasman food regulatory system.

But following substantial pressure, primarily from the baking industry in the last month or two, a high-profile and one-sided campaign and, by some accounts, polling indicating a lack of public appetite for the mandatory fortification, the Government secured a folate exemption under the terms of the transtasman agreement.

On Monday, it announced it would release today a discussion document proposing that the mandatory fortification of bread with the vitamin be deferred until May 2012.

"The proposal aims to give us more time to evaluate the risks and benefits of the standard and to take into account the wishes of New Zealanders," Minister for Food Safety Kate Wilkinson said.

Game over. How was the campaign so decisively won?

Let's have the truth

Can someone tell the public exactly how much folic acid is going to be in the bread - is it real folic acid or is it a chemical raised to be folic acid or is it some kind of sugar with folic acid or is it .00003 percent folic acid and the rest of it an additive? Also is not usually the rule of thumb that folic acid should be followed with the b vitamins?