President Whatarangi Winiata's bombshell request that MP Hone
Harawira resign from the Maori Party will throw the party
into unprecedented turmoil.
That was anticipated by him and co-leaders Tariana Turia and
Pita Sharples when the request was put to Mr Harawira at a
hui in Kaitaia on Thursday.
The fact the Maori Party leaders are willing to accept the
internal grief, and possibly a permanent rift with the north,
demonstrates how strongly they feel about Mr Harawira going.
It has been a decision reached more in sorrow than anger.
And it is more an act of self-preservation than of
punishment.
Mr Harawira sees himself as a likeable rogue, who performs an
important role as activist on "the edge" of the party and New
Zealand society.
But the leadership see him as an increasing liability, whose
divisiveness goes against the kaupapa - underlying ethos - of
the party and who threatens to damage the party's ability to
pursue its policy agenda in the coming year.
Next year will be a crucial year for the Maori Party, with
the ground-breaking whanau ora social policy set to be a
feature of the 2010 Budget, the sensitive repeal of the
Foreshore and Seabed Act due to be enacted and a
constitutional review considering the place of the Treaty of
Waitangi to be set up.
It is apparent from comments Mrs Turia has made that the
events of the past two weeks - after Mr Harawira went AWOL on
a parliamentary trip to Europe and wrote obscenities about
Pakeha - were the final clincher, not the sole reason for
asking him to go.
Dr Winiata met Mr Harawira last weekend.
It seems likely that at that meeting he raised the prospect
of the MP going independent.
Mr Harawira met old friends and media personalities Matt
McCarten, Willie Jackson and John Tamihere the same weekend,
who counselled him, and two days later Mr Harawira spent the
day saying sorry.
Mr Harawira said at his press conference in Auckland on
Tuesday there had been recent suggestion he leave the party.
No-one imagined it was the leadership who wanted him gone.
Mr Harawira declared his loyalty to the party on Tuesday, but
that was not enough to stop the president presenting his
request at the hui. Deeds are what count and in Mr Harawira's
contrition spree he opened up further fronts of attack
against Labour leader Phil Goff.
On the highly sensitive issue of the foreshore and seabed, he
declared that the Maori Party was taking back the foreshore
and seabed that Labour had stolen.
Dr Winiata, a gently spoken former accountancy professor at
Victoria University, has been the force behind the party as a
kaupapa-driven organisation - a set of principles on which
the party's policies, responses and behaviour are based.
Kotahitanga is one them, described in party literature as
being demonstrated through the achievement of harmony and
moving as one, and promoting harmonious relationships among
all people.
Another of them is "manaakitanga", which is described as
"behaviour that acknowledges the mana of others as having
equal or greater importance than one's own, through the
expression of aroha, hospitality, generosity and mutual
respect".
When asked at a press conference yesterday which kaupapa Mr
Harawira had breached, Dr Sharples cited "manaakitanga for
starters".
Mr Harawira had been a leader in most things he has done in
life until he entered politics.
It has been a difficult adjustment to being just another
player. In the north, he is king. In the party, he is not.
When Mrs Turia herself operated in Labour, there was no room
for obeisance to a party.
The Maori Party represents a broad church of views, from left
to conservative.
It is not Mr Harawira's radicalism per se that is the
problem, but his modus operandi, the way he expresses his
views in a polarising way.
Dr Winiata's ambiguous comments outside Thursday's hui
appeared to leave the door open to Mr Harawira to change his
ways and remain with the party "so long as he doesn't destroy
the party in the process".
But the press statement prepared ahead of time was more
definite and painted a divorce as a fait accompli.
Headed "independent status would acknowledge reality", it
said resignation from the party would free Mr Harawira and
allow him to act with the independence which he claimed.
It acknowledged that the situation would cause upset and
anxiety for Maori Party supporters in Te Tai Tokerau, "who
may feel their loyalties to the party and their MP are now
conflicted".
A by-election cannot be discounted whereby Mr Harawira
resigns from Parliament and seeks a new mandate.
Another option is that if an amicable agreement is reached
whereby he becomes an independent, the Maori Party might not
put up a candidate against him next time.
The very act of asking him to consider leaving will cause
resentment towards the party and perhaps create a
constituency among his supporters over the next couple of
weeks that encourages him to leave the party.
The alternative is that kaumatua of the north whom he will be
consulting in the next fortnight come up with a solution
acceptable to all.
Mr Harawira's electoral support in the north is not
spectacular.
In fact, he holds the second-lowest majority of the five
seats, next to Te Tai Tonga's Rahui Katene. He beat Labour's
Dover Samuels in 2005 by 3613 votes. Last year, he increased
his majority to 6308.
But that is less than the majorities held by Mrs Turia, Dr
Sharples and Te Ururoa Flavell.
It was clear from the press conference Mrs Turia and Dr
Sharples held at Parliament yesterday that their tolerance
for Mr Harawira is an at end.
The possibility of him remaining a colleague seems remote at
this stage.
There can be no mistaking the message: Mr Harawira is not a
team player and is not suited to the disciplines of a
political party. The hope is that he recognises that himself.
But Harawiras don't do humiliation, and the default position
would have to be one in which he fought expulsion - which in
itself could be damaging to the party.
It is a battle the leadership has calculated is worth
risking.
Audrey Young is The New Zealand Herald's political
editor.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.