In this secular age, what are we to make of the "Virgin
Birth?" asks Ian Harris.
What, in this secular age, are we to make of the virgin birth
of Jesus?
Can it be literally true that the young Mary conceived a baby
boy without benefit of a male's sperm? If it is not factual,
what is the story doing in the Bible?
What point is it making?
If the church's creeds, hymns and liturgies are anything to
go by, the response is yes, the story is literally true.
Jesus is human through being born of Mary and divine by
virtue of the intervention of the Holy Spirit.
That, some would say, lies at the heart of Christian faith.
Not so. Other interpretations are possible.
Indeed, American Episcopal (Anglican) Bishop John Spong goes
so far as to say: "Continued belief in a literal, biological
virgin birth for Jesus of Nazareth is based only on a faith
or a dogmatic commitment . . .
Such a belief is no longer defended on the basis of Scripture
[in scholarly circles], not even by Roman Catholic scholars,
who have much more invested theologically in the possibility
than Protestant Christians do."
To many in the pews, that would have to be one of the
best-kept secrets of the past 100 years.
The origins of the myth (using the word in the sense of a
story told to convey truth about life) lie in a combination
of the religious climate of the Mediterranean world in Jesus'
day, a Jewish interpretative technique, and the first
Christians' experience of the adult Jesus.
Without that experience, there would have been no call to
explain his origins: stories of childhood become of wide
interest only when a person has become famous in later life.
And it was the first Easter, not Christmas, that convinced
Jesus' followers that he was indeed the long-awaited messiah.
Matthew and Luke wove a virgin birth into their accounts of
Jesus more than 50 years after he was put to death.
Matthew was intent on showing how Jesus fulfilled the Jews'
long-standing dream of a messiah, and found in the Old
Testament book of the prophet Isaiah a verse he could build
on.
Unfortunately, he relied on a mistranslation.
About 730 BC, Jerusalem was besieged by two armies.
Isaiah, urging his king not to give way, offered as a sign of
hope that "a young woman shall conceive and bear a son, and
shall call his name Immanuel" (meaning "God is with us").
The implication was that if God was with them, the king was
right to stand firm and the son was clearly expected.
In Hebrew the word for "young woman" is almah , and modern
versions of the Bible translate it that way - the Old
Testament word for virgin is quite different.
When the Hebrew Bible was translated into Greek about 500
years later, however, the translators used parthenos (virgin)
for almah, introducing an idea that was absent from the
original.
Matthew picked up the mistranslation and applied it to Mary,
giving it a new lease of life in a context far removed from
Isaiah's world of national crisis and royal reassurance.
Over time, the idea of the virgin birth blossomed in the
evolving faith of the church.
The Old Testament also carries accounts of heroes who were
born miraculously to old or barren women.
Stories of divine calling follow a pattern of announcement,
doubt, assurance and promise of a sign - and Luke uses the
same sequence in relating the announcement of Jesus' birth.
The world beyond Palestine was also awash with stories of
virgin births: examples include Plato, Alexander the Great
and Caesar Augustus.
To non-Jews, the claim of a virgin birth for a man such as
Jesus would therefore not have been at all unusual.
Acknowledging that the gospel accounts include poetic
embroidery and myth does not mean they are worthless.
Rather, it recognises that the writers were calling on their
whole literary and imaginative repertoire to convey the
central truth that mattered to them - that in Jesus could be
glimpsed the ultimate meaning and mystery of life.
All they understood of God shone through him.
Saying he was born of a virgin through the power of the Holy
Spirit was a graphic way of expressing that.
- Ian Harris is a journalist and commentator.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.