Tax, the prime minister proclaims, is a powerful lever for
the Government to boost the economy's performance.
But at this stage instead of grasping that lever he is just
crooking his little finger around it.
He endorses the tax working group's analysis of the problems:
we tax all the wrong things from the standpoint of growth,
the system is riddled with unfairness, there is a hole in the
tax base around property and the system's longer-term
sustainability is at risk.
But he then goes on to rule out most of the options the
working group puts up for addressing these shortcomings by
expanding the tax base and lowering rates: no land tax, no
wealth tax on investment properties, no comprehensive capital
gains tax.
Some changes will nonetheless be made to the way property is
taxed.
On what these might be, John Key was silent.
But of the options considered by the tax working group,
scrapping the depreciation deduction for buildings appears to
be the only one left on the table.
That might be enough to fund a cut in the top personal rate
back down to to 33c, but not a lot more.
There is no mention of even the desirability of aligning tax
rates.
And no mention of company tax at all.
That may be an exercise in keeping options open until the
Budget, by which time it should be a bit clearer what might
happen to company tax across the Tasman.
An increase in GST remains under consideration but would
require compensating cuts to income tax across the board,
always an expensive option.
And the Government would not raise GST, he said, unless it
"saw the vast bulk of New Zealanders better off".
One of the options modelled for the tax working group -- and
it is only one possibility -- offsets the $2.1 billion
increased tax take from GST by cutting the two lowest income
tax rates by 2c in the dollar, which would leave income
taxpayers about $2 billion better off.
Overall it's a wash, which at the margin might encourage more
saving and less spending - desirable, but no more likely to
transform the economy than the last rise in GST did.
It is a far cry from some of the more radical options
modelled by the tax working group which might have allowed
the top personal company and trust rates to be aligned at 27
or even 25%.
- Brian Fallow of The New Zealand Herald
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.