Land use consents granted
for a controversial large-scale factory dairy farming
proposal in the Mackenzie Basin have been quashed, the
Environmental Defence Society (EDS) says.
The EDS launched a legal challenge in the High Court in
Timaru challenging the consents granted to Williamson
Holdings Ltd, Southdown Holdings Ltd and Five Rivers Ltd by
Waitaki District Council.
The consents related to 8555ha of the Mackenzie Basin which
involved housing more than 17,000 cows in large sheds around
the clock for eight months of the year and 12 hours a day for
the rest of the year, EDS said.
EDS chairman Gary Taylor said the original resource consents
and certificates of compliance were challenged as EDS
believed they were granted without proper authority by
Waitaki District Council.
A court memorandum now notes that in the course of
proceedings it emerged that the officer concerned from
Waitaki District Council lacked delegated authority in
respect of all the impugned decisions.
"As a consequence, all defendants accept that it would be
pointless to continue with this litigation," it said.
Among the court orders signed by all parties were
declarations recognising that the council's decision not to
notify the consent applications was invalid and of no effect,
and that the decisions to grant certificates of compliance
and resource consents were also invalid.
Mr Taylor was unsure whether the companies would re-apply for
the consents but he thought they might not pursue them.
Mr Taylor said the EDS did not believe decisions relating to
the Mackenzie Country landscapes should be decided by
individual resource consent applications.
"Clearly there has been a failure of public policy at all
levels. The Government has failed to provide national
guidance; the regional council has failed to identify
nationally important landscapes; and the two district
councils have failed to develop coherent and effective
district plans," he said.
Mr Taylor said a long-term strategic plan involving the
community, Environment Canterbury and the Ministry for the
Environment should be put together.
"EDS remains willing to work with the authorities to secure
an agreed way forward for the Mackenzie Country," he said.
"However, if decisions impacting on it continue to be made in
an ad hoc way, then we will continue to be vigilant," Mr
Taylor concluded.
The lawyer who represented the three companies behind the
proposal, Christian Whata, could not be contacted for
comment.
The three companies earlier this year also withdrew effluent
discharge consent applications after the Environment Minister
called them in.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.