Pakistan's captain Salman Butt, centre, arrives at Lord's
with other squad members for the fourth day of the fourth
cricket test match against England at the Lord's cricket
ground, London. (AP Photo/Tom Hevezi)
A sad day for cricket? Quite the opposite, writes AP
columnist John Leicester.
Damning allegations that Pakistan players took money to fix
matches and play poorly could be great for the sport if they
can be proved. That's because match-fixing, shady people and
shady money in cricket are boils that have long needed
lancing.
This could be the time.
If just a fraction of the extremely serious claims by British
tabloid News of the World holds up to police scrutiny,
cricket authorities will, one hopes, be forced to clean up.
Pakistan captain Salman Butt said his players gave only their
very best against England. We will believe that only if and
when someone in a police uniform says there was a legitimate
and legal reason why News of the World apparently
filmed businessman Mazhar Majeed taking piles of cash and
promising in return that bowlers Mohammad Asif and Mohammad
Amir would deliver no-balls at precise moments against
England.
If the subterfuge was as bad as it looks, then Pakistan - the
whole team, not just some players - must be banned from
international cricket. That is nothing personal against
Pakistan as a country, but its players and cricket officials
have used up their nine lives. If the latest allegations are
proved, then only when Pakistan demonstrates genuine and
concrete measures to stamp out corruption should it be
welcomed back.
Bleeding hearts will argue, rightly, that Pakistan cricket
and its passionate fans will suffer and that youngsters on
dusty pitches in Islamabad and elsewhere will forsake the
sport if the team is collectively punished. Banishment would
also look cruel in the wake of the mammoth deadly floods
washing through Pakistan, akin to kicking a nation when it is
down.
But not being resolute and not taking harsh punitive action
would condemn Pakistan players and cricket administrators to
making the same mistakes repeatedly.
This has been a blight on Pakistan cricket for years, says
former team captain Rameez Raja, writing in the Daily
Telegraph of London. Action is long overdue.
"Administrators have ignored the truth," he wrote. "In 1994,
I was on a tour to Sri Lanka when there was a lot of
match-fixing going on and did not play a single match. That
was because I was not in on the scheme. The manager, Intikhab
Alam, told me so afterwards. He sent a report to the Pakistan
Cricket Board but nothing happened. The board was frightened
of dealing with the big names involved and because of that,
match-fixing never died. The problem was not uprooted and we
are seeing the results."
This should not be seen as Pakistan's problem alone.
Match-fixing allegations are symptomatic of the wider way in
which cricket has gone giddy over money. It lives on the
moth-bitten old notion that it is a gentleman's game when the
truth is that it's no different from other sports that have
also sold some or all of their soul for piles of cash.
Promoter Allen Stanford, now accused of massive fraud, was
allowed to show off a clear plastic chest of the stuff -
bricks of $10,000 in $50 bills - in 2008 at Lord's, the
London home of cricket. Claims of corruption and financial
irregularities have cast a stink over the rich Indian Premier
League, too.
It shouldn't come as a surprise that players are getting
greedy and that some are willing to take sordid short cuts to
get their hands on the loot.
Suspicions of match-fixing are one thing. Hard, solid
evidence is quite another. It is rare for fixers to be
captured on video, as News of the World claims
happened. If the tabloid's surreptitiously shot footage is
everything it appears to be, we should rejoice that apparent
crooks acting in cahoots with gambling syndicates appear to
have been caught red-handed.
But we should also worry why tabloid reporters, not cricket's
guardians, exposed this alleged scam. The international
governing body of cricket, the ICC, has had an
anti-corruption unit in place since 2000, when the sport's
reputation was in tatters over match-fixing. What has the
unit been up to?
This sting makes the ICC's investigators look like they have
been asleep on the job.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.