Peter Ingram's spot is in jeopardy
As the New Zealand cricket selectors ponder two ordinary
batting collapses, their faith will be sorely tested as they
pick a squad for the second test in Hamilton this week.
Senior men Daniel Vettori and Brendon McCullum were set to
resume on day four of the first test at a near-hopeless 187
for five in their second innings, still 115 short of making a
dominant Australia bat again.
With the likelihood of heading to Hamilton for Saturday's
second test 0-1 down, changes must be considered.
No 3 Peter Ingram's spot will be under the microscope along
with the balance of the side, with just five specialist
batsmen, Vettori at No 6 and five specialist bowlers.
Ingram made a positive start in the first innings before he
was run out by a Tim McIntosh blunder for five, then
yesterday on one was beaten by Doug Bollinger's pace and
bounce which also accounted for BJ Watling, Ross Taylor and
Martin Guptill.
Bollinger took a test best five for 28 in the first innings
as New Zealand folded for 157, and added Watling and Ingram's
scalps in the second.
Loyalty played a big part in first test selections but Ingram
must be under serious heat from Central Districts teammate
Mathew Sinclair who was significantly called into the squad
for Wellington as cover.
Otherwise Ingram could remain at No 3 and a batsman selected
at No 6, either Sinclair or rising Northern Districts star
Kane Williamson who could also chip in with some useful
offspin.
Spinner Jeetan Patel could loom into contention if Hamilton
looked spin-friendly, but he was struggling for form in
domestic cricket of late.
With batting their biggest concern, six specialists would
appear a necessity but that would mean dropping a bowler; a
tough call between Tim Southee, Daryl Tuffey and Brent Arnel
who did enough on debut to warrant retention.
Either way, widespread changes are unlikely as coach Mark
Greatbatch no doubt demands some serious reflection from his
troops.
"We haven't judged line that well in this game. We know they
(Australian bowlers) hit the deck hard and a lot of the balls
aren't actually hitting the stumps," Greatbatch said.
"It's a matter of judging that line well so you soak up that
pressure. They've bowled very good areas for long periods and
we haven't been able to be positive enough to break those
shackles."
One batsman who stood up after a scratchy first innings was
McIntosh who dug in for 272 minutes and 220 deliveries for 83
yesterday. He was dismissed by a Nathan Hauritz turner just
three overs before stumps.
"He's that kind of player, he focuses well, he watches each
ball and relaxes in between. It'd be nice for him to keep
going.
"But he batted nearly five hours and if two or three guys
were doing that we'd still be well in the test match. It was
great focus, he learns quick and he's battled hard against a
bloody good attack."
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.