It's that time of year where everyone goes a little loopy,
where individuals and groups try for the elusive prizes very
few win and where decisions are made about who has or hasn't
been good.
Of course I'm talking about the madness associated with the
Halberg Awards, not Christmas.
The initial list of nominees for the often controversial
awards was released yesterday.
As a member of the 28-strong Voting Academy, it is always an
anxious but exciting time. It's like cutting people from the
"Christmas gifts" list and deciding who deserves a bigger
chunk of Christmas pudding and who doesn't - a task not for
the faint-hearted.
The academy has been strengthened by the inclusion of cyclist
and Olympic medallist Sarah Ulmer, netballer Adine Wilson and
rugby legend Michael Jones. In addition, providing some much
needed gender diversity among the media representatives are
Michelle Pickles (TV3 sports reporter, presenter, producer)
and Rikki Swannell (sports editor, Radio Network).
With a more diverse academy, it has been interesting to see
which athletes, teams, and coaches made the first cut. For
the uninitiated, the supreme Halberg Award (which is applied
to all categories) is to be awarded to the individual
athlete, athlete in a team, or team whose achievement
represented excellence in sport at the highest level.
Regarding this achievement, we must consider whether it
occurred in that sport's "pinnacle event" (or major or
milestone event), whether a world record, world ranking, or
world recognition was achieved, and what the quality of the
field/competition was. In addition, we must consider the
global nature of the sport.
Awards are always subjective because it is difficult to
compare apples and oranges, especially when some get more
time in the sun than others.
One of the things we must put to one side is the amount of
media attention some sports get over others, so it helps to
continually refer back to the criteria. By including
individuals on the Voting Academy who offer diversity with
regards to perspective, sporting experience, sporting
knowledge and the ability to see the broader picture, the
decision-making process is fairer (if not transparent).
The Halberg Trust is protective of the quality of the awards,
and keeping the categories to a minimum is one way of
protecting the brand.
This is a good thing, because there is nothing worse than
ceremonies where everyone gets recognized.
It diminishes the mana associated with such events, and from
a pragmatic point of view it tends to make the evening drag
out! A new award for Disabled Sportsperson of the Year,
however, is a much needed addition.
The Halberg Trust did its homework when considering adding to
the categories, and the addition was strongly supported by a
range of key stakeholders, including disabled athletes
themselves.
Being a team player myself, I'm super keen to contemplate the
recipient of Team of the Year.
Of course, much of New Zealand and the media were consumed by
the RWC 2011 tournament, where the All Blacks finally managed
to win the pinnacle event for rugby after a 24 year hiatus.
Surely, Graham Henry and Richie McCaw will be strong
contenders in their respective categories?
A team to make a late surge for consideration, however, could
be the Black Caps, who also managed to break a 26-year
drought in winning a test match against Australia on their
soil. Was it a "fluke" or an achievement worthy of national
recognition?
There was so much controversy regarding last year's Supreme
Winners - the All Whites - so I'm looking forward to more
healthy debate leading up to the February announcements.
Anyone out there think the Black Caps should be contenders
for the main prize? Let the arguments around the kitchen
table begin!
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.