How the dairy plant could look. Image supplied.
A $100 million dairy plant to be built near Glenavy could
start operating in August next year, after five resource
consents were granted to Oceania Dairy Ltd to build and operate
it.
Environment Canterbury (ECan) and the Waimate District
Council yesterday released two decisions granting the
consents for 35 years, clearing the way for the plant to be
built unless there are appeals to the Environment Court.
Oceania acting chief executive Paul Park welcomed the
decisions and said the aim was still to start production next
dairy season.
The company had to raise $75 million in capital, but Mr Park
was confident of achieving that by the deadline of March 31
for construction contracts to be let in April.
The granting of resource consents would give added confidence
to investors, he said.
However, a Glenavy farming family objecting to the plant is
not happy with the outcome, particularly the potential effect
on its export peony business and the views from their house
2.5km away.
Andrew and Jane McFarlane had not seen the decisions when
contacted by the Otago Daily Times yesterday but indicated
they had given it "their best shot" in opposing the plant at
a hearing in December and would not appeal to the Environment
Court.
"Time and resources are against us," Mr McFarlane said.
Mr and Mrs McFarlane fear plans to spray milk waste from the
plant on to land will raise groundwater levels and change
nutrient levels, killing the paeony plants.
Mr McFarlane said yesterday there would be no consequences to
Oceania if the paeony business was affected.
He also failed to see how conditions on landscaping would
hide the view of the plant from their house.
The other objector, Murphy Farms Ltd, represented by Robin
Murphy, had also not seen the decisions and said it was too
early to make a decision on whether to appeal.
Mr Park said Oceania and its consultants were still working
through the decisions but, at this stage, the company was
happy the project could go ahead.
He did not think the company would appeal.
"It's pretty much what we want."Oceania earlier this month
extended the deadline for raising $75 million in capital for
the plant from investors and farmers.
Mr Park said some were waiting for the outcome of the
resource consents process.
"That plays a big part - in some respects, it's a confidence
thing and certainly significant for investors," he said.
The two major issues identified by the hearings panel in its
decision were the effect of the plant on groundwater and the
view from the McFarlanes' house.
It was satisfied the wastewater treatment system would not
raise groundwater levels but called for ongoing monitoring of
groundwater levels and quality and imposed a review condition
to enable measures to be taken to mitigate any adverse
effects.
The panel acknowledged the plant would be "an unwelcome
intrusion" on the McFarlanes' rural outlook but "we could not
accept that the effects on landscape values to one particular
property in a rural environment of this nature are fatal for
a grant of consent".
However, it imposed four mitigation measures, including extra
landscaping, colours used on the plant and a variation in
materials.
david.bruce@odt.co.nz
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.