Benmore Dam with Loch Laird in the foreground. Photo: ODT
files
Two picnic areas in the Waitaki Valley have been rated
generally not suitable for swimming after the first round of
water quality testing carried out this season by Environment
Canterbury (ECan).
This year, ECan is monitoring 54 sites at rivers and lakes
and 46 coastal swimming zones throughout the Canterbury
region, which takes in the Waitaki catchment, including its
lakes.
The first round of testing started on November 17 and results
have now been posted on the ECan website, which has all sites
ranked.
Two Waitaki lakes sites have ranked poor in the initial
results - Lake Benmore at Glenburn and Loch Laird below the
Benmore dam.
Those ranked fair were Lake Middleton (next to Lake Ohau),
Lake Benmore at Sailor's Cutting, Lake Aviemore at Waitangi
and the Hakataramea River at the SH82 bridge.
Lake Middleton is the only site in Canterbury which has
deteriorated - from good to fair - since last season.
Good rankings have been recorded at Lake Tekapo camp beach,
Lake Benmore Pumpkin Point and Lake Aviemore Te Aka.
Top rankings of very good were recorded at Lake Ruataniwha
camping ground and Lake Benmore Ohau B.
In the Waimate district on the Waihao River, the popular
picnic spot of Black Hole was ranked poor and Bradshaws
Bridge rated fair.
ECan water portfolio chairman Mark Oldfield encouraged people
to check the rankings to see how their local swimming spots
were graded.
"But even good swimming sites should be avoided immediately
after heavy rainfall, which can wash contaminants into the
river, lake or sea," he said.
The grades are based on up to five years of monitoring data
and a risk analysis of nearby potential pollution sources.
The overall grades are set in November each year and do not
change during summer, although the weekly bacterial readings
may vary from week to week, depending on local conditions
like heavy rainfall.
The states of all sites are available on the ECan website
www.ecan.govt.nz/swimming.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.