A new power scheme on the Waitaki River is one answer to
reducing greenhouse gases and the consequent cost to New
Zealand meeting Kyoto protocol obligations, according to
evidence in the Environment Court yesterday.
The director of the Centre of Energy Research at Massey
University, Professor of sustainable energy Ralph Sims, is
recognised as one of New Zealand's foremost authorities in
renewable energy and climate change.
He described the Meridian Energy north bank tunnel concept
power scheme as "an innovative development" and "an excellent
project" meeting climate change goals.
Prof Sims presented evidence for Meridian on the benefits of
renewable energy projects such as the north bank scheme in
mitigating climate change and meeting New Zealand's climate
change objectives.
Increasing New Zealand's supply of renewable energy would
help mitigate increasing emissions in the electricity sector.
"If opportunities are not taken to build renewable power
stations at an appropriate rate, increasing electricity
demand will force New Zealand to build large scale thermal
generation plants," he said.
New Zealand would then incur the cost of greenhouse gas
emissions for the lifetime of the thermal plants which could
have been avoided by building renewable plants, he said.
However, an expert in renewable energy appearing for Dugald
MacTavish, an interested party opposing the granting of
consents, said demand side management (managing increasing
consumption) was one answer to reducing the need to build new
generation.
Director of the Canterbury University's Advanced Energy and
Material Systems Laboratory, associate professor Susan
Krumdieck, said that management could be aimed at improving
living conditions, reducing industry and commercial financial
burdens through rational pricing rather than spot market
pricing, developing new businesses and other methods.
The north bank scheme represented "an irreversible change in
the environment" that was not acceptable to "a significant
number of local people" on environmental, sustainability and
other bases.
Cross-examined by Meridian counsel Jo Appleyard, Dr Krumdieck
defined "significant number of people" as Mr MacTavish and
associates - "people in his group".
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.