Dairy battle not over, say opponents

One of the proposed dairy farm development sites south of Omarama. Photo by Linda Robertson.
One of the proposed dairy farm development sites south of Omarama. Photo by Linda Robertson.
Opponents of intensive dairy farming in the Omarama and Ohau areas were yesterday claiming a victory, but warning the war was not yet over.

Southdown Holdings Ltd, Williamson Holdings Ltd and Five Rivers Ltd, which had plans to develop 16 new dairy farms with up to 17,850 cows, confirmed on Thursday night they hade decided to withdraw resource consent applications to store and discharge dairy effluent on three properties they own or have contracted to buy.

• Developers say plan 'world class'

The companies, which say they have already spent $4 million in clearing the land and on hearings and scientific analysis, said the $3 million cost of going through a board of inquiry Resource Management Act (RMA) process, without knowing whether they had water for irrigating the farms and diluting the effluent, was too much of a risk.

However, if water is granted, the companies could still reapply for the effluent resource consents. That prompted opponents yesterday to warn the developments may not yet be over.

Omarama Residents' Association chairman Bill Gordon was not surprised by the withdrawal of the effluent applications.

The people in Omarama he spoke to yesterday were "quietly relieved" the potential threat to established tourism income had "gone for the meantime".

"If the alternative for the developers is some form of farming traditional to the area, such as sheep, beef and some crop, then that seems acceptable. The nutrient output to the environment from that is a sustainable fraction of that from dairying," he said.

Omarama farmer and North Otago Federated Farmers high country representative Simon Williamson was not surprised by the companies' decision.

"I always felt it [the development] wasn't going to happen. They did not do the science robust enough to warrant getting consents," he said.

The RMA process had been "really good".

"That's what it is there for, to make sure people don't do something wrong. Once something is done, it is difficult to undo it. Everyone has the chance to put their case forward," he said.