Centennial Ave retailer David Tidey in front of the angle
parking the New Zealand Transport Agency wants to replace
with parallel parking. Photo by Colin Williscroft.
An Alexandra retailer is not convinced changes to parking
outside his Centennial Ave shop will improve pedestrian and
cyclist safety, as claimed by the agency behind the proposal.
As part of a $1.4 million safety upgrade and resurfacing of
the street, the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) has
proposed to replace angle parking with parallel parking
between Shannon and Brandon Sts, to install a pedestrian
refuge on the pedestrian crossing in the same block, and to
build a roundabout at the intersection of Centennial Ave, and
Clutha and Killarney Sts.
Central Digital Imaging director David Tidey, of Alexandra,
said the proposed changes, which were designed to improve
pedestrian and cyclist safety, would not work as well as the
NZTA thought.
"There will not be enough improvement in safety and traffic
flow to justify the changes," Mr Tidey said.
"It has not been thought through well enough.
"It may not be ideal at the moment, but [what NZTA has
proposed] is not an improvement."
He called for open discussion on the proposals, which he said
had not happened.
Mr Tidey disputed an NZTA suggestion, made in the Otago Daily
Times on August 21, that parallel parking would be safer for
cyclists because it removed the need for motorists to reverse
into their path when backing out from an angled park.
"Backing into a parallel park will involve reversing into the
cycle lane from the middle of a traffic lane - holding up
traffic."
Pedestrian safety would not be helped by parallel parking
near the crossing, as to reverse into the parallel park
closest to it, a car would almost have to be on the crossing
first before it backed into the flow of oncoming traffic,
holding it up, Mr Tidey said.
"Any danger to pedestrians on the crossing is due to either
speed or inattention, and changing to parallel parking will
not change this."
There was parallel parking across the street from Mr Tidey's
business, immediately before the pedestrian crossing, which
had not made the crossing safer for pedestrians accessing the
crossing from that side of the street, he said.
If there was not enough guaranteed funding to do the whole
Centennial Ave upgrade at once, Mr Tidey said the roundabout
should be built first, so changes to parking around the
pedestrian crossing could be looked at more closely.
NZTA Central Otago area manager John Jarvis said the
advantage of parallel parking compared with angle parking was
visibility.
"With a parallel park, the driver and cyclist would both be
fully visible to each other.
When a motorist exits an angle park, their vision is obscured
until they are well out, which is not a good situation at
all.
"It's far safer to have parallel parks."
Replacing the angle parking with parallel parking was the
only way a central refuge could be built on the pedestrian
crossing, which would improve the safety of the crossing by
making it more visible, Mr Jarvis said.
"We wouldn't be able to build the central refuge with angle
parking [on the left-hand side of Centennial Ave, heading
towards Cromwell], as cars would reverse into it as they
pulled out."
Motorists backing into the parallel park closest to the
pedestrian crossing would have to drive partially on to it
but that was not uncommon, he said.
The No 1 priority in doing the work was resurfacing the road,
he said.
"If that's not done, it won't get through another winter
without significant repairs."
It made sense to do work on the road, pedestrian crossing and
footpaths at the same time, which was why if any part of the
overall job was to be rescheduled, it would be the
roundabout, Mr Jarvis said.
- colin.williscroft@odt.co.nz
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.