Click photo to enlarge
Garney Scoullar
A Dunedin man's six-year battle to gain funding support
highlights the need to strengthen ACC's code of claimant
rights, ACC campaigner Denise Powell says.
Garney Scoullar (51), a city resident now living in a house
bus near the Wingatui Racecourse, remains ill from
neurotoxicity arising from solvents he encountered in his
work as a city spray painter in the late 1970s and in the
1980s.
But despite a six-year struggle with ACC during which one
district court decision and two independent reviews have gone
his way, he is yet to receive any weekly earnings-related
compensation.
Mr Scoullar was forced to leave his painting job at Fulton
Hogan in April 1980 after becoming sick, experiencing
migraines and troubling psychiatric symptoms, including
hallucinations.
Mrs Powell, who is president of Acclaim Otago, a support
group for ACC claimants, said she was concerned about the
amount of time involved in Mr Scoullar's case, which featured
in an Otago Daily Times story late last month.
"It could have been handled far more efficiently and
speedily," Mrs Powell said in an interview.
Mr Scoullar had not received weekly earnings-related
compensation, but also, crucially, had not received the ACC
support he needed for the rehabilitation to improve his
health meanwhile.
Mrs Powell is also a member of ACC's Consumer Outlook Group,
a national forum involving community representatives and ACC
management.
The advent of the claimants' code, in early 2003, had been a
"positive move", she said.
The code sets out a detailed complaints procedure and
emphasises eight key rights, including the right to be
treated with dignity and respect, the right to be treated
fairly and to have the claimants' views considered.
Several of Mr Scoullar's rights may have been breached,
including his right to be treated fairly and to have his
views considered, she said.
However, his case also highlighted "the need for reform in
terms of the code".
The code could be improved by adding further "teeth", to
ensure that claimants gained more effective redress if rights
were breached.
The system could also be "beefed up" by requiring cases to be
dealt with in a more timely and efficient way.
Susan Brooks, the former Australian banking industry
ombudsman, had recently undertaken a review of the code for
ACC, Mrs Powell said.
ACC corporate affairs manager Laurie Edwards commented
recently that after the district court had granted ACC cover
for a complex organic brain injury, ACC had had to determine
what actual assistance for Mr Scoullar was appropriate,
including financial help, rehabilitation or other support.
His condition was complex and his circumstances confused and
ACC had found the situation "just as frustrating as Mr
Scoullar".
ACC had always sought to process claims as quickly as
possible and had met Mr Scoullar and his solicitor and agreed
on a course of action, Mr Edwards said.
Mr Scoullar said that since the earlier ODT story appeared he
had received a letter from ACC seeking more details about his
previous employment and noting that his incapacity would need
to be assessed.
Such matters could have been dealt with earlier and he was
concerned that further delays could result.