Council trims rates increase

Click photo to enlarge
Mayor Peter Chin discusses the council's options at an annual plan meeting yesterday. Photo by Peter McIntosh.
Mayor Peter Chin discusses the council's options at an annual plan meeting yesterday. Photo by Peter McIntosh.
The $45 million Dunedin Centre and Dunedin Town Hall projects have been rejigged and delayed by a year as Dunedin city councillors try to contain the size of this year's rates increase.

The more than $30 million Otago Settlers Museum redevelopment narrowly escaped budget cuts yesterday, with a one-year delay that could have compromised government funding beaten by a single vote.

However, the Regent Theatre's upgrade time line hinges on $2 million in fundraising being in place by the time the annual plan is approved in June.

The council ended the public part of yesterday's meeting with a 5.2% rates increase (down from 6.4% before the meeting), mostly from deferrals.

The following two years stand at 8.9% and 7.6%.

Those figures may change, as the council discussed the future of its harbourside project with the public excluded yesterday afternoon, and will consider Dunedin Venues Management Ltd's request for $2.4 million today.

The major projects were targeted by the council as it sought to cut this year's rates increase.

The changes mean the Regent Theatre work begins at the end of October this year, the Municipal Chambers in June 2010, the Dunedin Centre in March 2011, and the town hall in September 2011.

Deputy mayor Syd Brown moved options laid out in a report by community life general manager Graeme Hall and property manager Robert Clark, which delayed all the projects for a year.

That report, though, noted $3 million of Ministry for Culture and Heritage funding for the settlers museum would be at risk, and other sponsors might back out, if the time line of the project was increased.

Cr Brown said it would be a blow to some of the organisations involved, but a 12-month "breather" would ease some of the pain for ratepayers.

A venue was needed for graduation ceremonies, and with the option suggested, the town hall would remain in its present state until 2011, while the Regent could be used after that.

If the Regent could not raise the funds, it would still be available for graduations, as its upgrade would not start until the town hall was finished.

Cr Dave Cull seconded the motion, his motivation to "flatten the rate increases imposed on the city by decisions we've made in the last year or so to put so many debt-heavy projects in our time line".

Mayor Peter Chin argued against delaying the settlers museum, and said the council had been dealing with organisations involved for years, and the museum and funding organisations had been working under the present time line for all that time, and relying on it.

They would have a right to feel "aggrieved" if it was changed.

Other councillors raised concerns about the loss of government funds, with Cr Teresa Stevenson arguing the latter stages of the project may have to be dropped.

The council voted seven votes to six not to approve the option.

During discussion on the Regent Theatre, Mr Chin said he was confident the Otago Theatre Trust would be able to raise the necessary funds.

Crs Brown, Cull, Stevenson, Neil Collins, Michael Guest and Chris Staynes voted for the settlers museum delay, while Crs Bill Acklin, John Bezett, Fliss Butcher, Andrew Noone, Colin Weatherall, Kate Wilson and Mr Chin voted against.

 

 

Community or professional rugby?

Mike StK is dead right in identifying that those councillors that vote in support for an increased level of funding for DVML are those that are ignoring core activities in favour of meeting the ambitions of a few professional rugby supporters and their associated colleagues.

Let there be no mistake - this increase in funding for DVML is not to provide better community facilities at the Dunedin Ice Stadium, or the Edgar Centre. It is to concentrate on shortfalls at the new rugby stadium.

Councillors that plead that they knew nothing of the impending water problems, or those that somehow don't see the current condition of our roads, or those that haven't seen what is going on with Middle Beach erosion, or didn't understand the implications of other major projects don't really have a place sitting round the council table.

Ratepayers rely on councillors to both understand what governance actually is, and to ensure that core infrastructure maintenance or improvements are planned in a strategic and sensible way. That does not mean rubber stamping reports or recommendations from staff.

It is equally clear that most councillors, however, are determined for reasons best known to themselves, to ignore the wishes of the community, to not communicate directly to the ratepayers their justification for their voting record, and to carry on as though they were separate from the problem rather than being the cause of it.

Naked

I think the reason is obvious why the councillors are rabbiting on about how bad the rates increase is going to be and how hard they are working to fix it and yet seem never to remember to remind us that they're the ones responsible for the rise in the first place ....
I think that the emperor and most of his advisors are naked ...... and it's election year

DVML's $2.4m request

The request by DVML for $2.4m will be a litmus test for all councillors. Any approval to vote for this should tell us which councillors are ultimately prepared to sacrifice core services to the service of the rugby entertainment business. Any protestations of being concerned or willing to do something to contain debt will be seen against the voting line up for this request.

Crocdodile tears

It's good they've put off the townhall upgrade - the community gallery will be able to move back into the Princess St location asap.
Really though we need to see a commitment from the stadium project to reduce its costs too - I hear it's running a few months late and is also asking for more funding because they've finally realised they don't really have the facilities for the 30,000 they claim they will handle. It seems obvious now that the RWC will be held at Carisbrook.
It's time to admit that reality to ourselves and do whatever we can to save on costs. The Highlanders only get 5000 people to games, so we don't really need any more seats than that. We don't need a roof either - we could put that off until we can afford it, too.
To me, seeing the councilors gnashing their teeth this week over the terrible costs that are being foisted on the ratepayers rings so false - come on, it's election year. You guys voted for all these projects that are the problem in the first place - those are crocodile tears and claiming that you managed to save the ratepayers from yourselves is a bit silly.