History of neglect: Maori rock art was discovered by
Europeans at a time of ‘‘antiquarianism’’, when the
drawings were dismissed as ‘‘doodles’’, difficult to
understand , and a less interesting manifestation of Maori
culture than artefacts like tools or sites such as pa, Dr
Montelle says.
The drawings in Maori rock art depict human figures, moa
and bird-like figures, fish, taniwha, the huge extinct pouakai
(or Haast's Eagle), canoes, mythological figures and mysterious
recurring motifs.
Maori rock art is found at more than 550 sites in the South
Island and more lies hidden, waiting to be discovered. More
than 95 per cent of the art is located on private land. Most
sites are rarely visited.
Rock art drawings range from a single faded symbol on a
weatherbeaten rock to murals up to 20m long, drawn under the
overhangs of limestone outcrops.
The images are especially prolific in South Canterbury and
North Otago. The density of sites in zones near Pleasant
Point and Oamaru is astonishing. For example, there is a
cluster of 48 sites in a 2sq km zone near Pleasant Point.
Virtually every limestone outcrop has drawings.
For the past three years, a French anthropologist and
behavioural archaeologist, Dr Yann-Pierre Montelle, has been
methodically mapping, describing and photographing the South
Island's Maori rock art.
He does this fieldwork for the Ngai Tahu Maori Rock Art
Trust, a non-profit organisation established to protect and
manage the sites. The project is called Simrap (South Island
Maori Rock Art Project) which involves using the data to
create an electronic database that will form the basis of
protection and conservation measures at the sites and a
resource for ongoing research.
The trust is developing a tourism operation, the Maori Rock
Art Centre (expected to open in Timaru's Landing Service
building early next year), to provide funding for this work.
Dr Montelle (44) has lived in Christchurch with his New
Zealand wife for the past three years. He first learned about
Simrap from Lady Fiona Elworthy, whom he met while visiting a
rock art site on her family's Craigmore Station soon after
arriving in the country.
A specialist in human behaviour in caves, he lectures on cave
art archaeology and human evolution at the University of
Canterbury, as well as spending about three months a year
researching rock and cave art in Australia and Europe.
He believes the reason why New Zealanders know so little
about Maori rock art is that it was discovered by Europeans
at a time of ‘‘antiquarianism'', when the drawings were
dismissed as ‘‘doodles'', difficult to understand and a less
interesting manifestation of Maori culture than artefacts
like tools or sites such as pa.
Although fieldworkers had collected pieces since the late
19th century, they were not considered beautiful enough to be
prominently displayed in museums, he said.
Forgotten treasure: Until the 1990s, Maori rock art
suffered from public ignorance and a lack of scientific
inquiry, French anthropologist and behavioural
archaeologist Dr Yann-Pierre Montelle says.
As a result, Maori rock art had suffered from public
ignorance and a lack of scientific inquiry.
‘‘There has been very little work done here, so there is
nothing to show.
‘‘On the world map of rock art, there is no dot on New
Zealand. One of my jobs is to put the dot on that map.
‘‘People around the world are just starting to get very
interested in it.''
The only reference book on Maori rock art - Michael Trotter
and Beverley McCulloch's 36-year-old Prehistoric Rock Art in
New Zealand - was dated, Dr Montelle said.
Dr Montelle will contribute to a couple of books being
produced by the trust over the next few years, one of which
he expects will be a photographic work accessible to
non-academic readers.
Dr Montelle's fieldwork is building on the work started in
1990 by archaeologists Brian Allingham and Atholl Anderson.
So far he has visited and catalogued about 200 of the South
Island's 550 known sites. He usually spends three days at a
time in the field, spending anywhere between an hour to two
days mapping and documenting a single site.
Using a GPS receiver and laser distance meter, he fixes the
location of each site, then collects distance and angle data,
all of which is transmitted to a wireless handheld computer.
At the end of each trip, back in the office, he uploads the
data on to a computer to create a map that shows the position
of each drawing within a site, then plots the sites on a
Google Earth map.
This is complemented by high-resolution photographs and
detailed written descriptions of each drawing.
Within two years, he expects to have mapped all known sites.
The real fun would begin when the database was complete, Dr
Montelle said. It would form the basis of attempts to answer
the big questions hanging over the rock art: Who drew them?
When? And why?
The drawings might have started with the first wave of people
into the South Island between 700 and 1000 years ago.
Although it was impossible to know their intent, Dr Montelle
thought their early motive to draw was purely functional, to
make ‘‘spatial markers''- in other words, road signs.
‘‘People who are walking the land, looking for things,
finding things - you create a story for a specific area to
help you remember it.''
He believed the markers were gradually elaborated on, made to
depict local mythology and, perhaps, the genealogy of the
sites' visitors.
Interpreting the meanings of drawings made after contact with
Europeans could be informed by the memories of descendants
living today.
However, drawings made before this were beyond
interpretation, Dr Montelle said.
The best academics could do was make propositions and test
these with scientific analysis.
One of the most exciting prospects for the future of research
into Maori rock art was the opportunity to situate it in an
international context, he said. Comparative analysis of rock
art found on islands in the Pacific Ocean could improve
knowledge of migratory patterns. One of the best ways of
learning more about the image makers and their movements was
to analyse the charcoal and red and yellow ochre pigments
they used, he said.
Some drawings were made using dry pigments, which had made
them especially prone to disintegration and fading.
Other drawings were made with oil binders mixed into the
pigments to make them longer lasting, suggesting a desire on
the part of the image makers to pass on their stories to
their descendants.
Because Dr Montelle visited sites that were rarely visited,
he approached them with the attitude of a forensic analyst.
‘‘When I go to a site, I more or less go to a crime scene.''
There were no big clues, so he looked for the little clues -
to electron microscopic level.
Dr Montelle said South Canterbury people should treasure the
rock art as a fragile cultural asset.
‘‘It gives South Canterbury a universal dimension, because
rock art is universal.
‘‘It's a proto language - the first form of language that was
purposely placed to be read. If you don't protect it, it's
gone.''
Because of the natural ‘‘exfoliation'' of limestone, many of
the drawings were in an advanced state of degradation. Unlike
the cave drawings of Australia and Europe, they were exposed
to the weather and would slowly continue to fade away. Few
were fenced off from stock, which sheltered in the same
overhangs the image makers chose for their drawings, he said.
Dr Montelle said Timaru's Maori rock art centre would help
Ngai Tahu remedy this lack of protection, both financially
and by raising awareness.
Although he believed being a foreigner was an advantage for
his fieldwork, he believed the only people who could fully
appreciate the rock art were the descendants of those who
created it.
‘‘It must be amazing to come and see a moment in time of your
ancestor, just a few generations down the line.''
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.