Wanaka's latest subdivision plan - Riverhead Park, near the
Clutha River outlet - faces stiff opposition from several
local residents and environmental lobby groups.
Queenstown-based development company East Wanaka Land Trust
Holdings wants to create 52 rural lots on a 130ha block of
land, located northwest of Aubrey Rd and Outlet Rd, beside
the Clutha River.
The proposal has attracted 14 submissions in opposition, from
various Wanaka residents, the Otago Regional Council, and
from the Upper Clutha Environmental Society (UCES).
The UCES objects to the proposed new subdivision on the
grounds that a resource consent application "of this scale"
should be the subject of a council plan change.
Several residents neighbouring the proposed subdivision say
it would disrupt the views across rolling farm land from
their homes located on Mount Iron.
East Wanaka Land Holdings is a subsidiary company of
Queenstown-based developer Darby Partners Ltd, which also has
interests in golf course and skifield developments in the
Lakes district.
The applicant contends that the Wanaka Structure Plan makes
provision for the new subdivision, while the district plan
defines the proposal as a "discretionary activity," in its
rural general zoned location.
Opposing submitters say that the Wanaka Structure Plan has no
statutory authority and that the applicants seek to
circumvent district plan policies.
Four submissions have been received in support of the
Riverhead Park development, including one from the
neighbouring Lake Outlet Holiday Park and adjacent
subdivision developers for Allenby Farms Ltd.
A submission from the Upper Clutha Tracks Trust has requested
conditions relating to the protection of public access, in
the form of walking and cycling tracks through the area and
beyond, to the Clutha River.
A planning report from Queenstown Lakes District Council
planning authority Lakes Environmental is still to be
prepared, and a resource consent hearing date has also to be
decided.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.