New Zealand Prime Minister John Key has accused the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council of abusing their power and protecting their privileged positions, sidelining the elected members on that council.
Mr Key delivered New Zealand's statement to the General Assembly in New York late on Thursday afternoon (local time) after a week dominated by a standoff between Russia and the United States over Syria and criticism of the Security Council for failing to deal with Syria and its leader Bashar al-Assad.
He said New Zealand fought hard for a seat on the Security Council last year because it believed the UN was the only body able to resolve the world's most pressing issues. However, real action was too often blocked by internal divisions on the council.
"Since we have been on the council we have found it as hard as many of you warned. The council's agenda is lengthy and contentious. The dynamics within it are difficult."
Mr Key saved his harshest criticism for the five permanent members - Russia, the US, China, France and the United Kingdom.
"The permanent members have become used to exercising power and are protective of their privileged position. They presume to control the council's agenda and to determine its processes."
He said that made it difficult for the 10 elected members, and there were also structural problems.
"The challenge for a small elected member to have its voice heard and its views taken into account is considerable. That the five permanent members of the council have the veto creates extraordinary power imbalance."
That was worsened by the practice of the permanent members pre-negotiating outcomes to the exclusion of the 10 elected members.
John Key said that was why New Zealand supported the proposal for the veto power to be restricted in cases of mass atrocities and genocides - a proposal also supported by France and the UK.
'Time for the council to step up'
Mr Key said the failure to deal with Syria was evidence of the dysfunction on the council.
"It is time for the council to step up. It's time for members to set aside their vested interests and historical alliances in order to stop the violence and end the suffering."
While the council sat on its hands, thousands were dying and millions were displaced.
"We cannot afford to let the council go from an institution with failings to a failed institution. There must be a political solution to the conflict in Syria. And it must come soon."
Mr Key said the Iran nuclear weapons deal was a bright spot for the council, and should be the basis of something wider - "a fundamental reset of relationships".
"Nowhere is the re-setting of relationships needed more than in Syria. The question is not Assad or Isil (Islamic State). Both need to be dealt with."
Mr Key said the council could work well, such as implementing the Iran weapons deal. However, as well as in Syria it had failed in Yemen, South Sudan and with the stalled Middle East peace process.
The speech followed yesterday's Security Council meeting of foreign ministers at which New Zealand representative Murray McCully slated the council for failing to reach any resolution on Syria.
Following that meeting, Russia's foreign minister and the US Secretary of State had met to discuss a "deconfliction" process after confirmation Russia had begun air strikes in Syria, giving the US only one hour's notice to ensure they were not in the way.
Key proud but dispirited
As he prepared to leave New York Mr Key said he was proud of the contribution New Zealand was making on the Security Council and the values that underpinned New Zealand.
"I also leave dispirited by the Security Council's failure to help not only the people of Syria but those in so many other countries.''
Mr Key said a workable political solution in Syria would not be a perfect one. He also made it clear it was not just Russia he was criticising.
"Indeed, this is a classic case of the perfect being the enemy of the good. It will require international cooperation and compromise - on all sides.''
Despite his fighting words, Mr Key was speaking to an almost empty assembly hall because many leaders have now left New York.
