The mission to cut emissions

SSSSHH! If you listen carefully, you might just hear the two elephants in the room, named Coal and Agriculture, being quietly ushered into another part of the building.

On Monday, New Zealand finally stepped towards doing something nationally about the concatenating problems of climate change.

Climate Change Minister James Shaw released the long-awaited Emissions Reduction Plan, which aims to provide a road-map — whoops, don’t mention roads — towards the target of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

The task facing New Zealand and the world is to change behaviours and reduce emissions to keep global temperature rise by 2100 to well below 2degC above pre-industrial era levels, at which point it is believed runaway heating would begin.

It would be far more preferable to keep warming to 1.5degC or lower this century. However, the planet is getting hotter all the time and already appears on track — yes, tracks are much more politically correct to mention — to reach that point.

Better late than never when it comes to a plan. But “long-awaited” as a description is very much a euphemism. It’s getting on for 50 years since the first warnings were sounded about rising carbon dioxide levels in the southern hemisphere. Politicians and activists have been talking about the need to do something about it all since at least the early 1990s.

Mr Shaw and his team have worked hard on producing the plan and should be applauded for finally dragging something out into the limelight. But there is a sense that some of the more radical Green Party MPs and members, and those who want to see quick gains, will not be happy with something that seems merely acceptable rather than revolutionary.

One thing that does seem to be missing is a sense of urgency. Realistically, though, a balance has to be struck to ensure as many people buy into the plan as possible, and that is more likely with a moderate approach, as least initially. It has been a huge week for the Government, with an emissions plan, a Budget — and a big Budget at that — and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern stuck at home with Covid-19. Deputy Prime Minister Grant Robertson will no doubt breathe a sigh of relief now the weekend is here. He has done a good job in tricky circumstances.

But be honest — who has really been paying attention? There have been a lot of figures flying around and it is easy to become swamped by them.

Mr Robertson called Monday “the most significant day in our country’s history on climate action”. He said the move from “piecemeal” to “smart, long-term investment” was being made possible through a $4.5 billion response pot funded by the emissions trading scheme. An initial tranche of $2.9b was being invested in reduction plans over the next four years.

The plan largely targets transport, with $1.2b set aside. That includes $569 million for the Clean Car Upgrade scheme, to help lower and middle-income households get rid of older, petrol-hungry vehicles and buy more expensive electric and hybrid cars instead.

Emissions from transport are about 17% of the total amount and have risen by 76% since 1990. Earlier proposals by the Climate Change Commission to stop importing petrol and diesel vehicles by 2025 have been put off.

But what about coal and agriculture? Many critics have pointed out that agriculture, our biggest emitter, is not part of this first plan.

They also say that hyped new initiatives, such as a Centre for Climate Action on Agricultural Emissions to research how to reduce methane and other emissions, appear the same as the NZ Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, which has been working towards these goals with limited on-farm success for almost a decade.

When it comes to burning coal, there might be a ban on the installation of new coal boilers, but existing plants are not due to be mothballed until 2037.

Ms Ardern might be calling climate change action her generation’s “nuclear-free moment”, but in that instance we were leading the world, not struggling to keep up.


We really need to get things into perspective to understand the potential impact of committing $5-6 billion to stall climate change. By comparison, NASA spent $15.6 billion on the James Webb telescope and has an annual budget of around $37 billion. The US has so far committed $62 billion to assisting Ukraine in its war with Russia and is spending around $160 million a day in its war effort. It should be noted that war tends to have a large carbon footprint! While our efforts to do something positive are admirable we have to understand that other than the feel good factor for some, it is no more than window dressing and will make no significant difference other than reducing our quality of life?

Heat, floods, storms, death of species and blanching marine life. Lovely quality.

Hmmm! I think I’m with Elon Musk. The earth is stuffed and approaching it’s used by date. NASA needs more and it’s time to move on. Somewhere out there is a Planet B, even if it is man made?

When are people in New Zealand going to wake up to the fact that renewables, going electric with cars and regenerative ag are not only better but cheaper . The rest of the world's leading countries are getting on with it, even Britain and Australia ( not the federal government of course). New Zealand regularly leads on important forward thinking societal change. Alas when it comes to the one that would have the biggest benefit to us financially and as a society we are sitting on our clean green laurels and appear terrified to change. Time is running out before we will be simply left behind.

And your point is? NZ gets to dictate how the US should prioritize it's spending? That said, you make a good point. Why spend any money here when countries like china, India and Russia increase their emissions? Our money is wasted for what? Yep, we are doing the right thing but in the grand scheme of things it's nothing. Unfortunately, NZ doesn't get to impose it's wants and desires on the rest of the world.

Our journalists are your neighbours

We are the South's eyes and ears in crucial council meetings, at court hearings, on the sidelines of sporting events and on the frontline of breaking news.

As our region faces uncharted waters in the wake of a global pandemic, Otago Daily Times continues to bring you local stories that matter.

We employ local journalists and photographers to tell your stories, as other outlets cut local coverage in favour of stories told out of Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch.

You can help us continue to bring you local news you can trust by becoming a supporter.

Become a Supporter