For God, things are not as simple as wiping out all evil

New Zealand is fast approaching 1200 confirmed cases. Photo: Getty Images
Can the Covid-19 virus be considered evil? Photo: Getty Images
How do you define evil, Richard Dawson asks.

There are many who would condemn a God who would allow something like Covid to run rampant through this world.

For them a God who allows this is not worthy of believing or following. Of course, this assumes that Covid is evil. However, we must take account of the possibility of human collusion since it seems likely that poor safety standards around wet markets in China allowed the virus to jump species and infect humans.

Even so, what God would allow such a thing? For centuries, this question has been raised as a general objection to belief in a good God. For centuries and, indeed, the earliest examples go back to the Bible itself where whole books of the OT are devoted to the question. The Book of Job, dating back to some time around the 6th century BC, examines the tragedy befalling a godly man, leading to his questioning of God.

Much depends on how one defines evil. This is not as easy as one would think. Many things which appear evil in one context appear good in another. Knives are very useful when preparing food but can be used to perform evil deeds. Bacteria which in one context deal with rotting organic matter releasing vital nutrients back into the ground to be used again by living plants are essential and good in this context, but destructive and "bad" when they invade a living person causing sickness and death. Viruses may appear to have no good purpose but even now scientists have begun to use the machinery of viruses to target and kill cancer cells, to treat a variety of genetic diseases as gene and cell therapy tools, or to serve as vaccines or vaccine delivery agents.

Perhaps the most obvious example is us! We who are capable of such good, and of producing such beauty are the same people who choose to make war with each other, and engage in other evil activities. Does a good God do away with us so as to wipe the slate clean of evil, or does God put up with a certain amount of evil in order to allow the good to prosper? It seems that the second option is the one God usually takes.

So what is a good God to do? Perhaps the better question is what do we do? For example, we deal with children we love and want the best for. Yet they do bad things and resist doing good things they don’t like, such as doing schoolwork or tidying up. Do we do away with them just because they engage in such activities? Of course not.

God is a God of renewal and repair and for that reason a certain amount of evil is tolerated. Not accepted. Not approved of. Not condoned. Simply tolerated. Why? Because the greater good is served by doing this. There is more to be gained by enduring evil than by trying to wipe it out. The idea that we can deal with evil by killing it or by using it against itself has long been known to be faulty (Two wrongs don’t make a right ...). Evil must be addressed but it must be addressed in a way which doesn’t extend the harm being done.

Philosophers and others have made out the problem of evil to be something black and white; something simple to solve — good God means no evil. Evil being present means no good God. We know from our own experience that evil is just not like that. It doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It exists in good and lovely others; in places which are otherwise beautiful and for this reason one cannot simply destroy everything that is tainted by its presence. Jesus knew this well and left us a parable to illustrate just this point. It goes like this ... Matthew 13: He told another story. "God’s kingdom is like a farmer who planted good seed in his field. That night, while his hired men were asleep, his enemy sowed thistles all through the wheat and slipped away before dawn. When the first green shoots appeared and the grain began to form, the thistles showed up, too.

"The farmhands came to the farmer and said, ‘Master, that was clean seed you planted, wasn’t it? Where did these thistles come from?’

"He answered, ‘Some enemy did this.’ The farmhands asked, ‘Should we weed out the thistles?’ He said, ‘No, if you weed the thistles, you’ll pull up the wheat, too. Let them grow together until harvest time. Then I’ll instruct the harvesters to pull up the thistles and tie them in bundles for the fire, then gather the wheat and put it in the barn’."

 - Richard Dawson is minister at Leith Valley Presbyterian Church in Dunedin.


Children do not harbour 'Evil', despite the doctrine of Original Sin. Adults choose Good, or Evil, which gives the entity called 'God' an out. Evil in the Old Church is the Absence of Goodness {Godness}. Pure Evil is not relative, but bent on destruction.

As I grow older I find more and more difficult to accept this God justifying nonsense as spouted by minister Dawson above.
Let’s assume for a moment that the God of Abraham, the god of the Jews, the christians, and the muslims exists. Then clearly he is a flawed entity. He created us, he gifted us with free will, and he punishes severely if we exercise that free will against his rules. Just doesn’t make sense.
As for all the plagues he has inflicted on humanity, he created them to do exactly what they do, which tells you a little about his personality. But, having created them and seeing the devastation they have wrought either he has the power to fix it and he chooses not too, in which case he is some sort of monster, or he does not have that power and can’t undo his handiwork in which case he is not omnipotent. To me the the flaws in the God story, and the justifications and manoeuvring presented by his self proclaimed representatives render the whole thing a fiction.
All this bovine scatology written by minister Dawson above is nothing more than the church, organised religion, making stuff up to keep the flock under their control. I reject it totally.

The author, too, has free will. To that degree, his thoughts are his own, not imprimatur.

Our journalists are your neighbours

We are the South's eyes and ears in crucial council meetings, at court hearings, on the sidelines of sporting events and on the frontline of breaking news.

As our region faces uncharted waters in the wake of a global pandemic, Otago Daily Times continues to bring you local stories that matter.

We employ local journalists and photographers to tell your stories, as other outlets cut local coverage in favour of stories told out of Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch.

You can help us continue to bring you local news you can trust by becoming a supporter.

Become a Supporter