John Key celebrates retaining power after the general
election in Auckland. REUTERS/Nigel Marple
New Zealand Herald political columnist John
Armstrong lays out the reasons for National's victory in the
general election.
1. Stability rules, okay?
The election was won - and lost - long before the official
campaign got under way. National's support may have slipped
during the campaign, but it remained at historic highs.
Labour's plumbed new lows. The electorate's conservative
streak saw parties of that ilk picking up nearly 60 per cent
of the vote. National played to that sentiment by promising
stable, pragmatic government. Labour could not compete. It
had to have points of difference. But its big-ticket reforms
were out of sync with the mood of the majority of voters.
Labour needed to define this as a "change election". It never
had a hope of doing so.
2. It's the economy, stupid
Uncertain economic times meant voters opted for the finance
team they knew, rather than one they were barely aware of.
The final pre-election Herald-DigiPoll survey showed voters
favouring National by two to one over Labour when asked which
party would be best at running the economy. That poll has
consistently shown between 55 and 60 per cent of voters think
the Government is moving in the right direction.
3. The Key phenomenon
John Key may be immensely popular but, crucially, he's also
trusted by voters. National struggled to cope against Helen
Clark when her ratings reached similar highs. Likewise Labour
with Key. The Prime Minister's flaws may have been exposed by
the "teapot tape" saga but Key could draw on big reserves at
the Bank of Credibility to compensate.
4. The "let's give them another go" principle
New Zealanders rarely turf out a Government after just one
term - unless it has performed really badly. Steven Joyce,
who was in charge of National's campaign, summed it up when
he said yesterday that people thought National had done a
pretty good job given it had been dealt a tough hand. As
Joyce's Labour counterpart Grant Robertson acknowledged,
Labour was "fighting history".
5. The Goff factor
Labour's leader needed to connect with voters three years ago
- not three weeks ago. Goff may have been judged to have won
the election campaign, but he lost the war. Labour shed more
than 165,000 votes on election night 2008. Goff has to go -
but will be allowed to do so with dignity.
6. Labour's spending plans
"Debt" was a four-letter word in this election. National was
very careful about committing to new spending. Labour was
also careful, producing extensive costings and revenue
forecasts. The numbers may have added up in Labour's mind;
they did not in voters' minds.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.