Apartheid, animosity, outrage ... the 1981 Springbok tour
to New Zealand still stirs strong memories. Shane Gilchrist
discusses positions with former Otago rugby coach Lee
Smith.
Lee Smith.
Just over 30 years ago, on August 11, 1981, Lee Smith
watched as his Otago rugby team came close to beating South
Africa at Carisbrook. Yet despite the laudable result (13-17),
the coach was nowhere to be found when it came time for the
post-match speeches.
Opposed to the tour, yet with a sense of responsibility to a
side he had taken over the previous year, Mr Smith admits to
feeling torn at the time.
"Really, being a fairly liberal person from a teaching
background (Mr Smith was then a 35-year-old teacher at
Bayfield High School), I was against the tour, as were a lot
of teachers, who withdrew their services from rugby.
"I had a responsibility to the team so the only stand I made
- which is pretty pathetic I suppose - was a policy to deal
with the team and nothing else," recalls Mr Smith, who
arrived with the team at Carisbrook and left immediately
after the game.
Mr Smith's stance had become public knowledge a good month
before the Otago-Springboks match. In a front-page article in
the Otago Daily Times, in relation to an anti-tour
rally planned for July 3 in Dunedin, his opposition was
affirmed in newsprint.
He had also been contacted by a reporter from the now-defunct
tabloid Truth who, claiming to have rung other coaches
in New Zealand to ask what stand they had taken, elicited a
response from Mr Smith.
"In fact, I think I was the only one who answered the
question.
"The players knew of my opposition. But the Otago management
didn't. John Dowling (deputy chairman of the Otago Rugby
Union at the time) rang me up to say, 'oh, you've made this
stand then? Well, that's OK'. Really, I got no flak from the
Otago union and it didn't affect my appointment the following
year, either."
The Springboks might not have arrived in New Zealand until
July 19, 1981, but public debate and demonstrations had been
brewing for months, if not years.
In 1973, Norman Kirk's Labour Government directed the New
Zealand Rugby Union to not invite the Springboks to tour
following decades of reciprocal tours, for which the union
had adopted a policy of not selecting Maori players in sides
visiting South Africa (a notable example being fullback
George Nepia's exclusion from the 1928 All Blacks touring
team).
However, the National Party's election victory in 1975
facilitated a tour to South Africa the following year. The
repercussions were widespread, 28 African states boycotting
the 1976 Montreal Olympic Games because of the International
Olympic Committee's refusal to ban New Zealand from the
event.
Come 1981, divisions within New Zealand in regards to rugby
relationships with South Africa were widening.
According to a New Zealand Herald poll carried out
between July 25 and 30, 1981, that asked, "Should a Springbok
rugby team have come to New Zealand?", 42% were in favour,
49% were opposed and 9% did not know. In Dunedin those
figures were 27%, 68% and 5%, respectively.
That split even found its way into the All Blacks, with
captain Graham Mourie and centre Bruce Robertson opposing the
tour, as did Gary Seear, who also refused to front for Otago,
a move which gave his coach a few headaches.
"He was the All Black No 8," Mr Smith recalled from his North
Auckland home this week.
"We were a bunch of ponies, really, and he was the tallest
player we had, so it affected our lineout play."
Despite the blocking of the Southern Motorway by about 500
protesters (according to ODT estimates at the time;
others put that figure even higher) and attempts by a smaller
group of people who infiltrated Carisbrook and blew whistles
before being ejected by police, the Otago-South Africa game
was largely unaffected.
"The interesting thing for me on the day was the tension
surrounding the tour meant we performed beyond ourselves. I
think the military and police who accompanied us to the game
raised the tension," Mr Smith says. "The guys thought, 'what
the hell are we going into?'
"A number of our players had connections to the Maori
community, so I think they looked on the game as a way to
show the South Africans that even a small area like Otago
could bond and perform well.
"It was incredible. We'd said that at the kick-off our
players were to saw off at the ankles the first opposition
player who got the ball. Well, I think the biggest player in
their team took the ball and Ken Bloxham took his legs away.
That started the whole game. The match went in a flash. We
probably played as well that day as we ever did.
"I think we would have won the game if not for a penalty shot
which ultimately gave South Africa the victory. The ball hit
the flag on the upright and dropped down next to the
goalpost, and the South African captain was in the best
position to catch it. He scored and they converted it.
Without that, we could have won the game."
Now the International Rugby Board's regional development
manager for the Oceania region, Mr Smith recalls it took
years for some to enjoy rugby again.
"It took a long time for that sourness to go. I moved from
Dunedin to Wellington in 1986 and even then teachers weren't
taking rugby in schools - well, not the one I was at. The
local club was having to provide coaches.
"I really think that if we hadn't won the 1987 World Cup, the
1981 tour would have had a long-term detrimental effect on
rugby in this country. That World Cup win unified the country
once again behind the game."
Though South Africa's apartheid laws were repealed a decade
later - in 1991 - Mr Smith believes it is important New
Zealanders remember the events of that 1981 tour.
"I think it was good to show a country like South Africa how
people can get on and live together. We are a good example -
though we are not perfect - of race relations.
"I remember [former New Zealand netballer] Waimarama Taumaunu
being asked about race relations some years ago. She said you
don't need to worry about that; they'll be solved in the
bedrooms of the country.
"I always remember that. Look at your own family: there will
be different ethnicities within it."
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.