Kim Dungey looks at two more workplaces already providing
flexible working arrangements and gets the view from the
employer's side.
Employers' representatives say new legislation giving
employees the right to request flexible work arrangements has
had little, if any, impact. They claim what has made a
difference is the tightening labour market and employers
realising they need to be more flexible in order to attract
and retain good staff.
Phil O'Reilly, chief executive of Business New Zealand,
describes the Employment Relations (Flexible Working
Arrangements) Amendment Act 2007 - which was proposed by
Green MP Sue Kedgley and supported by the Government - as the
most "pointless piece of legislation" he has seen.
"Flexible hours is a great idea and people should be
encouraged to think about it all the time. But passing silly
laws is utterly irrelevant to that need and, in fact, is
likely to get in the way of it."
Mr O'Reilly says the law fails to take account of the fact
that flexibility is rarely an issue between just one employer
and one employee but has an impact on everyone in a
workplace. Traditionally, time off has been negotiated
between staff on an as-needed basis, but the law would lead
to "queuing".
"If you get your request in first, you'll get your
flexibility. But if Dave gets in third, he won't."
Local employers' representatives say while it is early days,
there has been no evidence of a rush of applications since
the legislation took effect in July.
Duncan Simpson, chief executive of the Otago-Southland
Employers' Association, and John Christie, his counterpart at
the Otago Chamber of Commerce, say employers had become more
flexible, anyway. And both see the trend towards flexible
work continuing despite the economic downturn, with skill
shortages in many areas, from IT and forestry to traditional
trades such as electrical and plumbing.
A strong advocate of flexible work, despite misgivings about
the legislation, Mr O'Reilly says different types of
flexibility are suited to different types of workplaces. But
no employer should use the excuse that flexibility is not
possible.
"The traditional view of flexibility, where you allow people
time off or to work from home, is much more capable of being
put into place in offices and service environments.
"That's why it is most used in IT, consulting, banks and
accountancy firms . . . But it is still possible in
manufacturing plants, retail shops and bars. It just requires
more thought and effort."
He says that as well as enabling employers to keep their
"best and brightest", flexible work avoids what he calls
"present-ism" - where employees are at work physically but
their brains aren't.
"If you're stressing at work about something you want to be
doing, if you're worried about your sick mum or about child
care, you're much less likely to be a good employee at work."
New research from the Families Commission shows that for
employees, the culture of a workplace plays a big part in
whether or not they ask for flexible work arrangements. The
need to maintain an adequate income and having the confidence
to negotiate with managers are also important factors.
Mr O'Reilly says workers need to give the reason they are
seeking flexibility and to engage with their employers rather
than make demands.
Many employers have a "19th-century" mind-set of jobs being
either full-time or part-time, but any job is just a
collection of tasks, he adds.
Employees who can show how those tasks will be done each week
under a new arrangement will increase their chances of
success.
"An employer might worry that maybe the work won't get done
or he might have to bring in a replacement and that will be
expensive, or that he will have to put upon other employees
to fill in.
"That's why employees should think not just about their
circumstances but their workmates' circumstances and how [the
arrangement] might work for everyone."
For more information on ways employers can introduce
flexibility, go to the commentaries section of the Business
New Zealand website, www.businessnz.org.nz.
For information on the Department of Labour's "Work-Life
Balance Workplace Project", go to www.dol.govt.nz
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.