Port Otago channel submissions closing

ODT Otago Harbour file photo.
ODT Otago Harbour file photo.
Public submissions on Port Otago's proposed widening and deepening of the lower harbour, covering about 13km of channel from Port Chalmers to salt marshes opposite Taiaroa Head, close on Friday.

There have been anecdotal concerns raised about environmental issues, surrounding silt-laden water and silt settlement but no indication Port Otago's largest capital expenditure proposal is building into a major environmental issue.

Port Otago, which has so far spent about $1.5 million, lodged a resource consent application with the Otago Regional Council in May for the channel-deepening project - which is expected to cost more than $100 million - to allow the passage of larger container ships.

The application listed about 30 affected parties: eight commercial, four environmental, seven recreational or sports groups and 11 local groups.

It was understood few submissions had been lodged so far.

Dunedin spokesperson for the Surfbreak Protection Society, Nik Reeves, said Aramoana beach was one of the country's best breaks and called for submissions.

St Clair surfing club South Coast Boardriders Association was also calling for submissions.

Ms Reeves said in a statement yesterday while previous sand dumping had improved wave quality at Aramoana in the past, she wanted dumping more closely monitored and the spoil to be dumped further out to sea.

Because of the size of the 200-page Port Otago document and data provided, when the regional council publicly notified the application the public submission period was doubled from the usual 20 working days to 40 days.

This time period expires at 5pm on Friday.

While Port Otago's application concludes there will only be minor effects associated with the removal and dumping at sea of about 7.2 million cu m of sand and silt, groups with interests in aquatic and avian wildlife, beaches and the foreshore are expected to make file submissions this week.

Port Otago claims most of the 7.2 million cu m of sand and silts (of varying weights) would go to the offshore dump site, 6.5km from Taiaroa Head, with the plume of the released sediment expected to settle 18km towards the north and be 5km in width.

The effect on recreational fishing and diving is likely to be localised and short term, while for surfing and swimming, there will be a negligible reduction in wave height, with no increase in erosion or build up, the application says.

Subject to consent, Port Otago has said shipping line demand for a deeper channel could be from two to 15 years away and the port would "immediately" extend its current maintenance dredging programme, at a "low intensity" level using its dredge New Era to remove about 1.45 million cu m annually.

Once larger ship visits were confirmed, it would use an international dredging contractor to complete the project, estimated to be about 110 days of dredging.

simon.hartley@odt.co.nz

Regional councillors

Kris, you are not the only one to have problems getting a response from Gretchen Robertson. Happened to me too over the proposed new ORC headquarters. Seems that if she preceives the issue to be controversial there's no response from her. Not good enough. Other councillors - Deaker, Brown, Eckhoff - were prepared to listen and discuss the issue. Send in your vote.

Otago regional councillors

The funny thing is that the Otago regional councillors (with the exceptions of Deaker and Neill) did not even bother to return my calls regarding the dredging 24/7 and one of the regional councillors is supposedly an environmentalist. Here is her resume, and where does she stand on this issue?

Gretchen Robertson is a Dunedin resident currently living in Andersons Bay. She graduated from the University of Otago with an honours degree in Ecology specialising in aquatic ecosystems. Since working as a water quality scientist with Wellington and Otago Regional Councils, Gretchen has been employed with the NZ Landcare Trust. She manages integrated, community-led approaches to waterway management. Gretchen is passionate about Otago?s environment and enjoys tramping, sea fishing, native plants, and painting.

Not only that there is a giant conflict of interest in the Otago Regional Council hearing its own application, but there is still no word on who the independent experts are to hear the submissions.

What use is the election when the whole thing will be decided before the elections?

Port Otago

Remember this. Port Otago is "owned" by the Otago Regional Council. And very soon those council members will be applying again for their jobs on the council. And who will decide whether they deserve another 3 year contract? You - the voter. So ask the candidates what their views are on the dredging proposal. And if it does go ahead, why not pump the dredged spoil up the Harbour to reclaim Anderson's Bay inlet? The job was originally only half done. Or why not reclaim some land at the top of the Harbour for leisure and car parking?  It's been done before. Now we no longer have John Wilson Drive access. Now the only car parking area on the westside of the Harbour by Portsmouth Drive is blockaded by "artistic" rubbish and a 2 hour parking limit.
So get out and vote.

Another thing

How crazy is this? Port Otago, along with 3 other ports in New Zealand, are dredging and deepening their channels because they are all going after the same contracts. Only one port in NZ can be the hub. Ridiculous waste of money for such a small country ......

People vs the environment

While I am not happy that the environment will be disturbed, not once has your paper - or anyone else for that matter - thought about the people that live along this coast. They will be subject to 24/7 noise from the dredging. We are not a third world country - although it is certainly feeling like it. Why should we have to  loose sleep because Port Otago want to dredge for 3 years 24/7? This 100-day dredge thing is bogus - read their application. It's 3 years and more than just two dredges. Not one word has been spoken about humans. We live there. We don't want the noise of their industry ...its against all the WHO rules. Why should we take on this burden because Port Otago want to profit from it? [Abridged]

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
School of HospitalityDunedinAcademic Institutions
Cromwell Top 10 Holiday ParkCromwellHoliday Parks
Omakau Four SquareOmakauSupermarkets
Bellamy's GalleryDunedinArt Galleries & Museums