Council split over Christchurch

John BezettThe Dunedin City Council is split over whether or not Dunedin should be proactively marketing itself as a destination for Christchurch business and families considering relocation.

Nine months after the first devastating quake, calls are now being voiced to debate whether Dunedin moves from being reactive to proactive to attract Christchurch businesses south, while a survey yesterday shows the quakes' effects appear to have spread through the country's business community.

Because of the differing views, councillors are scheduled to meet next week in a workshop and consider recommendations, which are being collated this week by senior council staff, the Otago Chamber of Commerce and Otago Southland Employers' Association.

The future for Christchurch business has been brought into sharp focus, not only in the wake of escalating and compounding damages from Christchurch's three major quakes, but the harsh reality this week that Canterbury's councils are struggling to secure crucial reinsurance policies.

Councillor John Bezett said while council staff had been looking specifically at the issue of businesses which could relocate south, the Government decision last week to pay out 5100 homeowners had prompted "several councillors to voice their opinion" in recent days.

"We don't want to be seen taking advantage of what is a tragedy for Christchurch," Mr Bezett said.

"[However] there is some conflict in council as to what could be done next," Mr Bezett said of some councillors who wanted the council to "proactively go out" and market Dunedin, while others were opposed to any sort of campaign.

In a survey by Grant Thornton New Zealand, compiled after the September and February quakes but before the June 13 quakes, found up to two-thirds of business around the country had been affected in some way, including a decline in demand, disruption to transport and other infrastructure services and a reduction in staff and management.

The survey found 18% of businesses had suffered long-term effects, 26% suffered a medium-term impact and 20% had suffered a short-term hit. Anecdotally, there has not been a flood of businesses relocating to Dunedin, but commercial agents are reporting increased inquiries and a small number of medium enterprises, and some professionals, with fewer than 20 employees, have moved south.

Chamber of Commerce chief executive John Christie said because nine months had elapsed since the first Christchurch quake in September, homeowners and businesses have had to deal with a "string of major problems" and were now considering their short- and long-term options differently.

"Dunedin doesn't want to pull businesses out of Christchurch, but the reality is things have changed up there over the months and businesses are now being pushed out," Mr Christie said.

Mr Christie said issues raised in the survey had been experienced in Dunedin, such as supply interruption, damaged goods, problems in distributing to Christchurch, a decline in sales and also tourismThe chamber's president, Peter McIntyre, said he did not believe central Government was giving enough regional emphasis to options; considering up to 20% of business, and or residents, are wanting to leave Christchurch.

"The Christchurch issues are bigger than Dunedin; they affect the whole South Island now," he said when contacted yesterday.

The relocation issue has been spurred in recent days by revelations reinsurance for council assets is not available, which means the likelihood of "through the roof" rates for Christchurch ratepayers.

"Dunedin is a viable option for them, as opposed to Auckland or Sydney.

"It has sound infrastructure in its port, airport, healthcare and education, which all leverages into the growing hinterland," he said.

Grant Thornton partner in Christchurch, Tim Keenan, said one of the overriding problems facing city businesses after the spate of earthquakes was the shrinking talent pool of staff and senior management.

"With it being unlikely that people, outside of the construction sector, will move to Christchurch in the medium term, the demand impact for talent and skills is likely to have an inflationary effect on wages and salaries," he said yesterday.

A critical focus of employers in the region is the retention strategies they are executing in their businesses as this demand for talent rises.

simon.hartley@odt.co.nz

Why not, everyone else will

It's not a time to be too 'precious' about Christchurch. Would Christcurch interests hesitate, for one moment, to sieze the advantage were the roles to be reversed? Of course not. They have been enticing Dunedin business north, for years, sometimes on the flimsiest  of pretexts. 

Late last year, I was delighted to have taken part in a mass rally designed to keep our existing neurosurgical services intact in Dunedin. At that time, Christchurch was the 'enemy', the more so, because its scheme was to misappropriate all South Island neurosurgery for itself. At the risk of seeming churlish, I think we should take that and other factors into account, before being so downright 'nice' about the situation. 

What's suffering is not Christchurch, as such, it's the people, individually out there in the suburbs. I think we should offer them every assistance possible, and if that includes relocation, then so be it. In fact, one could, quite easily, question the wisdom of the central city being rebuilt, at all, on the same site, in view of the fact that such 'quakes from now on, might well prove to be commonplace.[Abridged]

Oh for Pete's sake ...

Dunedin is half-way down the financial s-bend and wondering whether to try an attract new businesses or not? How can this even be a question?

Here is a clear example of why Dunedin's management needs a sweeping out of the self-protecting old-boys and a healthy injection of successful, world-aware people.

Or is that actually the reason for not wanting to attract any outsiders?

Courting Christchurch businesses

Totally agree. All Kiwi's feel for the citizens of Christchurch. But our council should be actively promoting Dunedin to any Christchurch business looking to move to a more secure area. We need to act as the South Island's second largest city looking out for their big brother.

I'm not in favour of advertising Dunners to individual citizens who are tired of the continuing quakes, but surely there is no moral dilemma in showcasing our city to businesses.

What surprises me is the reluctance from some of our councillors to market our city. Done with honesty, compassion and understanding, there shoud be no guilty feelings. Get those dusty thinking caps on councillors.

Get over it

So we "don't want to be seen taking advantage...", wake up and smell the coffee folks. As John Key said "this isn't CH's problem its NZ's problem. We are all going to suffer from this quake in some way or other. My heart goes out to the folks in CH, especially those who lost friends and loved ones, but now is the time to be moving forward.

It will take time for CH to rebuild and in the meantime local business struggles to find suitable premises and many families, especially those with young children, will be uncomfortable staying in the area. What are they to do? Move to Auckland? Or even worse for NZ, move over the pond to OZ.

The Dunedin City Council should step up and make the effort, not only for Dunedin but to offer an alternative for CH residents and enterprises as well. We could make this a WIN/WIN for all. Rate-free period for relocating business, recruitment support etc.. All things that modern councils have been doing to attract new citizens for a long time.

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Family PlanningDunedinSocial Services
Shane Griffin LoggingMiltonSawmilling
Brand It (Monogramming)Wanaka
Wolfenden & RussellDunedinClothing