Labour has called for a review into the controversial oil and
gas industry technique of horizontal hydraulic fracturing,
increasingly being used to penetrate deep underground rock to
release natural gas.
The horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (fracking)
technique has been used on 40 onshore wells in Taranaki for a
number of years, while fracking could be used by L&M
Energy in Southland in the near future, where L&M has
identified large gas reserves trapped in shale (clay)
deposits in the Waiau basin; to the west of Ohai and Otautau.
Labour had flagged the possibility of an inquiry before the
election, and yesterday, environment spokesman Grant
Robertson said the implications of fracking in New Zealand
should be a priority when Parliament resumes.
"There is international evidence to suggest that the process
of fracking can contaminate groundwater, which could have
serious consequences for rural communities, dairy farmers and
milk processors if it goes unmonitored in New Zealand," Mr
Robertson said in a statement.
Following its first term in government, National remains
committed to opening up New Zealand's resource sector to more
exploration and production, in a bid to boost export receipts
and economic output.
In the fracking process, a drill hole is lined with steel
casing and charges are detonated in the pipe to fracture rock
then a mixture of about 97% water and sand and 3% chemicals
is injected at high pressure into the fissures; allowing gas
or oil to flow more freely. However, there is growing concern
world-wide that the toxic chemicals used in fracking fluid
can potentially get into underground aquifers and contaminate
water sources; as could the methane (coal-gas) which is
released.
It is mainly the 3% of fracture fluids causing alarm.
The Petroleum and Exploration and Production Association
(PEPANZ) said in November that some of the chemicals in
fracture fluids were "extremely toxic", such as biocides.
While present in low concentrations in the fluid, they
required careful environmental management to avoid adverse
effects; noting the hydrocarbon-based fluids were being
replaced with lower environmental impact water-based systems.
Mr Robertson's call was prompted by a protest of more than
250 anti-fracking demonstrators at a Hawkes Bay Regional
Council meeting on Wednesday, attended by representatives of
TAG Oil and the Apache Corporation which are seeking to
explore three sites in Gisborne, central Hawkes Bay and the
Tararua districts for drilling and fracking.
"Fracking has been suspended or banned in many parts of the
world. It makes sense for New Zealand, with our clean, green
image in mind, to prioritise an investigation into the
effects of the process here on our own soil," Mr Robertson
said.
TAG's presentation to the council outlined an oil exploration
process which would have a "50-50" chance of using fracking,
Hawkes Bay Today reported.
Apache senior adviser of regulatory affairs Alex Ferguson
said if initial findings confirmed oil deposits and consent
was granted, there was a 50-50 chance fracking would be used
in the drilling, although he later said he believed the first
two test sites would be fracked. Apache has an East Coast oil
exploration budget of about $125 million.
Mr Robertson called for a fracking review to be done by
either a strengthened Environmental Protection Agency or the
Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment.
simon.hartley@odt.co.nz
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.