Southern District
Health Board chief executive Brian Rousseau has begun the
process of determining who among his staff want to meet the
South Island neurosurgical services expert panel when it
comes south at the end of the month.
It might take a couple of days to sort that out and he would
then advise the panel accordingly, he said yesterday.
The panel - Anne Kolbe, Glenn McCulloch and David Russell -
are visiting Dunedin, Christchurch and Invercargill in the
week from Monday, August 30 to Friday, September 3.
Extra visits may follow and other South Island centres may
also be included.
How the panel's visit to the board's monthly meeting in
Invercargill on the Thursday of that week will work is not
yet clear.
While arrangements for the panel's work is continuing,
repeated requests from the Otago Daily Times for
clarification on legal issues related to the decision-making
process being followed by acting Director-general Andrew
Bridgman remain unanswered.
Doubts were raised last weekend by Southern board member
Richard Thomson with his fellow board members and chief
executive Brian Rousseau about the power of the
Director-general to impose a binding solution.
Mr Rousseau confirmed yesterday he had yet to hear about any
matters he had raised concerning the terms of reference.
Yesterday, the ODT was advised a prepared statement on the
issue had yet to be given approval by Mr Bridgman.
The ODT has sought answers from the ministry about
whether there was any concern the South Island boards might
have been acting outside the terms of their own collective
decision-making framework when they referred the matter to
the Director-general and asked him to appoint an arbitrator.
The ODT has noted the framework document does not
refer to arbitration, only mediation.
It asked what checking was done by the Director-general on
the legal basis for his dealing with the dispute before the
panel's terms of reference found the final decision would be
his.
On Thursday, similar questions were put to Minister of Health
Tony Ryall's office, which advised the ministry had already
provided comment on the issue.
Mr Bridgman's weekend statement was that he had been invited
to arbitrate by the boards and that was what he would do, on
receiving the advice of the expert panel.
The ODT explained this response did not address the issues
raised.
A lengthy email to the minister's office yesterday from the
ODT on the issues and their seriousness drew no
response.
- elspeth.mclean@odt.co.nz
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.