Chin hopes history will judge council in better light

Dunedin Mayor Peter Chin fires a parting volley at his critics while addressing councillors near the end of the final Dunedin City Council meeting for the term yesterday. Photo by Craig Baxter.
Dunedin Mayor Peter Chin fires a parting volley at his critics while addressing councillors near the end of the final Dunedin City Council meeting for the term yesterday. Photo by Craig Baxter.
Dunedin Mayor Peter Chin hopes history will be a kinder judge of the Dunedin City Council's achievements over the past three years than some of his outspoken critics.

Speaking near the end of yesterday's final Dunedin City Council meeting for the three-year term, Mr Chin drew a round of applause after firing a parting volley at those who criticised the council's performance.

He read a list of 21 projects and other initiatives undertaken or completed during the past three years, and praised the achievements of the city's "good, wise and experienced" councillors.

He said he had enjoyed his own time as mayor, and hoped history would judge his efforts - and those of his councillors - favourably.

"I believe we have served the city well with our robust debate, and I firmly believe that in the years ahead that maybe the people will look back on our commitment and the decisions that we have made with perhaps a kinder view than some do at the present time."

Mr Chin is standing for mayor again, but with just days to go until results are revealed on October 9 is facing a strong challenge from Cr Dave Cull, according to an Otago Daily Times poll of voters who had made their decisions.

The poll, published late last month, showed Cr Cull ahead on 45.9%, Mr Chin second on 37.4%, and Lee Vandervis third on 11%.

Mr Chin said it was an "appropriate time" to reflect on the council's achievements yesterday, and - while there had been differences along the way - believed councillors had worked well together for the benefit of the city.

The list of capital projects and initiatives Mr Chin read out included the Regent Theatre upgrade, the development of the Wall Street mall and Tahuna wastewater upgrade, as well as support for businesses - through the industry project fund - and investment in free wireless internet in the Octagon.

"And, of course, we have the project that has really taken and consumed a huge amount of our time - the stadium," he said.

Mr Chin also singled out the "commitment" of council chief executive Jim Harland for special praise, as well as the rest of the council's staff.

"Three hundred and sixty-five days a year the staff are there, looking after the interests of this city ...

"I think as a council we are very grateful to them," Mayor Chin said.

He noted all councillors were standing again for election and wished them well, saying the result was now "in the hands of the people".

"On the 9th of October, it will all come to pass," he said.

 

Well said Camerondn

Camerondn: I have yet to see a more succinct assessment of the current Councillors - well done.

They're sleepwalking to oblivion, but even if the whole lot of them are cleaned out, we all have the legacy of their ill-considered deeds. I hope that we will find in time that some of them will be accountable. [Abridged]

'The Silent Majority'

One thing which has intrigued me during this whole stadium debate, is that highly 'fluid' entity, 'The Silent Majority'. In my experience, this term came into common use during the Aromoana smelter debate. It was to a mythical 'silent majority' that the (then) Mayor Skeggs appealed, when all reason failed and public sentiment dictated otherwise. We would have a smelter because it was, supposedly, supported by a 'Silent Majority'; the same 'Silent Majority' need it be pointed out, which was expected to carry-the-day with respect to the Stadium and to which the 'inner circle' of the CST CEO's dozen or so closest cronies appealed on many occasions, (and likely still do). Well, it appears from this morning's O.D.T. 06-10-10), there IS actually a 'Silent Majority' after-all, and unless my instincts prove to be badly astray, it IS about to be heard.........finally; and in the most potent place, the ballot-box.

Comment on ODT vote

This council has 1. Not consulted ratepayers on large non-core projects directly effecting rates. 2. Has not funded non-core projects from public sources as indicated. 3. Has lost contact with the wishes of its voters 4. Allowed non-elected staff to have far too much say in the direction of this city and allow their number and cost to grow past what is reasonable. 5. Allowed city debt levels to get to unreasonable levels affecting incoming councils for years to come 6. Loaded council-owned companies with debt 7. Is trying now to stand again on such a record and continue the above.

In your dreams, Mr. Chin

The truth will prevail. 
A future to look forward to... of increading debt (as other stadia have well proven, eg accross on Oz).

A shame they couldn't be brought to account. Voting them out is just the nice bit. [Abridged]

Political accountability

 

And that's the point - if I go out and buy a fancy car on tick and mortgage myself to the hilt I'm responsible for paying it all - as it should be. But politicians can walk away from their mistakes and leave us to pay for them.
This is why deciding to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on some luxury like a stadium needs buy-in from the ratepayers. The council can't decide for us - we should have had a referendum rather than having the thing rammed through against our wishes. It wouldn't have been a hard thing to do.
Instead, the only thing we can do to show our disapproval of what the council has done is vote out the people responsible. Don't forget - do it today.

 

Confusing spend ups with prudent management

The problem with this council is that they have confused the spending of debt money on glamorous capital projects with prudent financial management. On a personal level we can spend a lot of borrowed money on ourselves and, for a while, feel good about it and crow about it. However,sooner rather than later, the chickens come home to roost. On a council level this is what history will judge the present council where they have adopted the line that we spend up big now and we, and future generations, pay later.

Chin and the council's history

If the majority of people are behind the stadium then Chin, Walls and co. have nothing to worry about.

Chin's future for us

Yes a future of "intergenerational debt" for our children rather than a city with a sound and growing economy so that the kids will stay here and work and grow families.

I don't believe the current council has had any real plans for the future other than getting their names on plaques on public edifices. Where's the replacement in our economy for F&P? Those jobs are gone - but we have to pay higher rates - Chin has told us (ODT interview) we'll be getting great big rates rises for the next two years to pay for the stadium - but we're not getting great big pay rises - there's a recession on.

Look at Invercargill, Tim Shadbolt's worked hard to bring jobs to his community - the result has been amazing. But our aging, out of touch, council is just interested in circuses rather than jobs - it's time to replace them - now - don't forget to vote by Wednesday.

Swansong

Finally, Peter Chin thinks he can hear people speaking. But will he ever accept how much damage has been inflicted on his watch? Like Tony Blair, he'll probably be in perpetual denial. No recognition of the hardship from which some will never recover.

Wait for it

Cue the barrage of written abuse from the Anti Stadium people.
Good luck Chin, despite the constant opposition and negativity you have faced, you have provided Dunedin with a future to look forward to.
I do hope you are around to enjoy the fruits of your labour and get the kudos you deserve.

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Angus Restaurant & BarDunedinRestaurants
Little Hut CateringDunedinCatering
Bowen Logging LtdDunedinAir Conditioning & Heating
Grow NZ IncDunedinCommunity Groups