Cycle options to test DCC

southerncycleway_jpg_4ce0663e07.jpg
southerncycleway_jpg_4ce0663e07.jpg
southerncycleway_jpg_4ce0663e07.jpg
southerncycleway_jpg_4ce0663e07.jpg
The Dunedin City Council today faces a decision on yet another multimillion-dollar project, at the same time as it grapples with ways to curtail mounting spending and debt.

The latest project, though, opening the Caversham railway tunnel to create a cycle link with Mosgiel, has popular support, fits in with policies on sustainability, is environmentally sound, and could add to a valuable tourism resource.

It has been identified as the "missing link" of Otago cycling routes, and supporters say it will also bring economic benefits in future from tourism, health benefits from cycling, and cost savings from keeping cars off the road.

At what is the first committee meeting of the new council, the planning and environment committee will today consider the Southern Cycleway Project Feasibility Report.

The report, from Opus International, was released in August, with the objective of encouraging cycling by providing a flatter gradient, additional recreation amenity and a safer route to the South.

Council staff have suggested the committee chooses "option B", a $3 million project that would reopen the Caversham tunnel, and improve cycle lanes to Green Island and Mosgiel.

There has been growing public support for more cycleways in Dunedin in the past few years, particularly during the public consultation phase of the council's annual plan.

The 2009 plan attracted 100 submissions on the subject, amid concerns about peak oil and climate change, and the need to reduce Dunedin's carbon footprint.

Dunedin Tunnels Trail Trust spokesman Gerard Hyland has been lobbying the council to open two former railway tunnels, which he has said could link Dunedin to the successful Otago Central Rail Trail, attracting tourists to the city.

But the council is under intense pressure to make savings, with revelations last week council managers were under pressure to help find $6 million in savings and slash next year's forecast 9.1% rates increase by two-thirds.

The Opus report provides four options for consideration, and suggests "option A", the most limited response, as the preferred option.

But a report to the meeting from acting transportation planning manager Lisa Clifford said while the project was unfunded, and it was unlikely the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) would provide funding, her department "invites council to consider the benefits of option B", and approve further detailed investigation.

"In addition, it is requested that the council work with community groups to investigate option C as a longer-term solution to be considered at the January council meeting."Ms Clifford last week said there was no money in the council's budget for the work, and she had received feedback from the NZTA which made clear it was "highly unlikely" to help.

She was unaware of other government funding schemes, but: "That does not preclude us looking for other options."

Mr Hyland said the council recommendation was "a great start, it really is".

He said the costings needed to be looked at carefully, as those in the feasibility study might show the outer limit of what would be required.

He still hoped for NZTA funding, as that organisation's focus needed to be wider than "tar seal for cars", and should include infrastructure for other forms of transport.

His group was keen to help through voluntary work or fundraising.

On the issue of the council's drive to save money, he said there were benefits not readily apparent on a balance sheet, including the economic return from tourism.

Planning and environment committee chairwoman Cr Kate Wilson said nobody would want to cycle up the Caversham highway to Lookout Pt once it was developed into a four-lane road, and, in that context, option B was the best option.

Cr Wilson said she was "positive", with the goodwill of the people who came to annual plan meetings, help from the Dunedin Tunnels Trail Trust, the council and the NZTA, the project could have a future.

"Can we work collaboratively rather than at loggerheads?" she asked.

"Can we do it without the council doing the whole thing?"

- david.loughrey@odt.co.nz

 

The Tunnels trail

Obviously the best option is where both tunnels are used. To reduce the financial burden the project could be split in to two projects. The first project would centre on the Caversham Tunnel. This would then only require half the projected cost in the first year. Lets get together and make this a community project halving Opus's total estimate.

Town to Taeri cycle/walking trail

What great news that the new council is going to investigate the Tunnels Trail. Well done, councillors.

Richard Thomson made the point that the Town to Taieri Trail must be developed as part of the city's essential infrastructure, as we face a future where oil is going to be much more expensive. It's a "must do" investment rather than a "nice to have" project.

He suggests that the trail be included and prioritised as part of the overall transport budget, rather than as a separate project. Investigating and developing the trail could be paid for by deferring resealing of some roads for a couple of years.

I'm sure we would all be happy to have a "no frills" trail, along the lines of the Otago Central Rail Trail packed gravel trail.

Caversham tunnel

The Caversham Tunnel is an icon in the area. As an ex-Cavvy boy I have walked through the tunnel on many occasions. It would be marvellous to put it to good use.
One way of decreasing the cost of construction would be for all those that are able to volunteer some of their time to get together and work on the project in the form of providing labour our professional services. I for one would put my hand up and pitch in for a worthwhile project that would definitely attract people from all round our nation and all over the world.

Why so expensive?

I struggle to see why this project is so expensive when compared to much longer cycleways being constructed by our neighbours.
The Alexandra to Roxburgh cycleway, for example, is nearly 30km long, needs the construction of bridges and yet is expected to cost $3.3m.

Perhaps the proposed cost of the Dunedin options says something about the spending habits of our council staff and their consultants.

Before the new council decides to stop this great project on the grounds of cost they might like to borrow our neighbours' consultants to see how it could be built for a much more reasonable cost.

Caversham tunnel

I, for one, hope to see the Caversham tunnel reopened. Not only would it be useful for pedestrians and cyclists, it is also of great historic interest and will appeal to visitors to Dunedin as well as local residents. Old rail tunnels open to the public tend to be people magnets. There are examples of that worldwide. Maintaining existing facilities is the council's duty and responsibility. Boarding them up, or flattening them, then chucking millions at building new ones when they are not necessary is not.

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Good Hi FiDunedinCar Audio & Security
Preens DrycleanersDunedinClothing
R&L Systems LtdDunedinComputer Services
Tony Bell Stopping Services LtdDunedin