There is an urgent need to address patient safety issues in
general practice, University of Otago researcher and general
practitioner Dr Katharine Wallis says.
Strengthening the safety culture within organisations is the
key to this, rather than playing the blame or cover-up game,
she suggests.
Patient safety research in general practice lagged behind
that in hospitals, but there was an urgency to address it
because more health care was provided in the community
setting, increasing the opportunity for patient safety
incidents.
With the help of a World Health Organisation grant, Dr Wallis
recently carried out research at 12 Dunedin general practices
to see how a safety culture tool called the Manchester
Patient Safety Framework could work here.
She presented the findings of this pilot scheme at the WHO
headquarters in Geneva this month.
Dr Wallis said the harm caused by healthcare had been
identified as one of the most important public health
problems in the developed world.
She found the Manchester tool could be adapted and used in
the New Zealand setting to introduce the concept of a safety
culture, helping to promote communication about patient
safety and, in some practices, it led to changes being made.
Following the pilot scheme, one practice reported it had
started a programme called "Mr Patient Safety" as a means of
recording incidents.
Awareness of safety had improved and there was greater
communication among staff around managing complex patients in
that practice in a uniform way.
Five levels of safety culture can be applied to practices,
with the most immature called the pathological, where the
attitude was "why do we need to waste our time on patient
safety issues?".
In this culture, information was hidden, failure was covered
up, new ideas were crushed, and sharing information and
learning was actively discouraged.
At the highest generative level, "managing patient safety is
an integral part of everything we do".
At that level, information would be actively sought, new
ideas welcomed and failure would prompt inquiry rather than
cover-up or blame.
Study findings could be transferable to other countries where
small health practices were common and where discussion about
patient safety was in its infancy, she said.
Dr Wallis said the Manchester framework had been adapted for
New Zealand and its use was endorsed by the Royal New Zealand
College of Genera Practitioners.
That endorsement meant it could be used as an approved
quality improvement activity which would count in
practitioner recertification processes.
elspeth.mclean@odt.co.nz
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.