City dog fee discrepancies 'ridiculous'

Hyde farmer Bevan Dowling with his dogs Fog and Kate, which cost him $108 to register with the Dunedin City Council each year. If he lived 15km north, he would pay just $22 to the Central Otago District Council. Photo by Craig Baxter.
Hyde farmer Bevan Dowling with his dogs Fog and Kate, which cost him $108 to register with the Dunedin City Council each year. If he lived 15km north, he would pay just $22 to the Central Otago District Council. Photo by Craig Baxter.
If registering a working dog in Central Otago costs $11 and in Waitaki $28, why does it cost $86 in Dunedin?

Figuring out why he pays more than some of his neighbours to register his working dogs has left Strath Taieri Community Board chairman Barry Williams barking mad.

He lives in Middlemarch, governed by the Dunedin City Council which charges $86 for one working dog to be registered and $22 for each subsequent dog.

Working dog registration fees in the Otago region vary from $11 in Central Otago, to $25 in Queenstown and $28 for the first and $13 for subsequent dogs in Waitaki.

The fee discrepancies were "ridiculous", he said. "I'm not advocating people not to register, but I'm close to it."

The fees kept creeping up and "we've moaned every year" but he hoped a strongly worded submission to this year's annual plan would pull the cost down.

Mr Williams "never really had an answer" as to why the fees were so high for working dogs, but thought a lot of the fee revenue was spent on radio advertising to target domestic dog owners.

"The ones they are trying to target probably are not registered anyway." He believed a $20 fee for the first dog and $10 for dogs thereafter would be more reasonable.

However, DCC development services manager Kevin Thompson disagreed, saying when the fee structure was applied to the average number of working dogs on a farm - four - it was reasonable.

To register four dogs in Dunedin cost $152, while in Porirua it was $280 and in Nelson, $256.

While he "understood where they are coming from", the council was running a full-time animal control unit in a metropolitan area and could not operate on the revenue generated in smaller areas such as Clutha or Waitaki.

The DCC animal control unit's budget for 2010-11 was $401,200 of rates funding. Its forecast revenue was $1,030,000 and expenditure was $1,400,000.

The council had 15,241 dogs registered, 1324 of which were working dogs. Revenue from registration fees funded the animal control unit which dealt with 3776 complaints last year, 129 of which related to working dogs.

Mr Thompson said the fee structure was "historic" and did not expect the council to change it. Central Otago District Council manager of planning and environment Louise van der Voort said the district council maintained a differential between urban and working dogs.

"In recognition of the fact that the cost of dog control largely comes from dogs in urban areas, rather than farm dogs," she said.

All of the council's registration fees went into dog control and working dogs "don't put a lot of cost on our system".

Waitaki District Council regulatory services manager Paul Arnold said all of the council's dog registration fees went to dog control.

Dog problems were far worse in cities than in rural areas, which he believed could be behind Dunedin's higher fees.

ellie.constantine@odt.co.nz

 

All fees and no service

The fee structure is completely unjustified considering there is little or no animal control action taken in the rural sector and registration cannot be policed. Basically, this is an honesty tax.

We stupidly fell for this tax when we bought our first working dog. We already had a pet dog registered for the $86 (which is a ridiculous price in itself given we don't have access to any of the services we are forced to pay for) and asked the council before we got the new dog how much it would cost to register. They told us $22, as we already had a dog. It seemed reasonable enough (well, as reasonable as I've come to expect from the council) so we agreed to take the dog.

When we picked the dog up from its previous owner, he strongly advised us not to register it. Why not we thought? It's a $22 registration fee vs a $300 infringement fee...easy maths.

However, the council then proceeded to charge us $86 for both dogs as the first dog is not a working dog. When I asked what was the difference I had to sit through a condescending lecture about why greyhounds aren't working dogs.

My point was there is obvioulsy some kind of ownership fee of $64 ($86-$22) that the council sees fit to charge for the "first dog" and then every dog after is at the "dog" fee of $22.

So it shouldn't matter if the first dog is a pet, working dog or three legged chihuaua as long as they get their full payment for it. Following logic, the next pet dog would cost $86 and the next working dog would cost $22.

However, arguing with the council is like arguing with a petulent todler, it doesn't matter how many times you ask them to justify their fees all you get it "do as I say or else".

The "or else" would cost us $300, whereas we are already shelling out $172 per annum. If you can keep you dog away from the animal control officers eyes (not too hard around here) then it won't take you too long to break even if you ever get caught out.

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Caversham PhysiotherapyDunedinPhysiotherapists
Port Chalmers KindergartenDunedinChildcare & Kindergartens
Classic Outdoor FurnitureMosgiel
Joinery SpecialistsDunedinSpecialist Trades