|
|
Steve Chisholm, of Queenstown, shows the insulin pen he was forbidden to take into the All Blacks-Fiji test match at Carisbrook in Dunedin last Friday. Photo by Olivia Caldwell. |
A Queenstown couple, who were stopped by security guards from
taking an insulin pen into last week's All Blacks-Fiji test
match at Carisbrook because it was a "dangerous weapon", are
concerned others might be prevented from taking life-saving
medication to rugby games.
Rugby authorities said the incident appeared to be a case of
over-zealous security guards thinking they were doing right.
The action was not policy and would not be during the Rugby
World Cup.
Queenstown real estate agent Beth Chisholm said she kept the
insulin pen and a blood tester in her handbag for her husband
Steve, a type-1 diabetic; and "never, ever" went anywhere
without it.
The couple had been to many games at Carisbrook and never had
an issue with the insulin pen, which was discovered last
Friday when security checked Mrs Chisholm's handbag.
When she stressed the importance of having the medication at
hand at all times, she was told by the security guards her
husband "needed to eat prior to the game", that there would
be first-aid posts within the venue which would have insulin,
and that the couple should always carry sweets in case the
diabetic had a "low".
They took the insulin pen to their car, but during the game
Mrs Chisholm checked at a St John first-aid post to see if it
had the insulin her husband needed. It did not.
"This is of great concern to us, not only for other
insulin-dependent diabetics, but also those people who need
to carry Epi-pens for allergic reactions. It is not always
easy to find a first-aid post when you only have a short
timeframe in order to administer medication."
Dunedin diabetes specialist Prof Jim Mann said yesterday it
was "ridiculous" someone should not be allowed to take their
insulin pen into a rugby match.
"In my 35 years, or more, as a specialist in the area of
diabetes, I have never heard anything so ludicrous," he said.
A St John spokeswoman said qualified staff working at matches
did have medication for administering in cases of diabetic
lows.
St John was unaware people were not allowed to bring insulin
pens into venues, she said.
Rugby authorities were also surprised to hear of the
incident.
Otago Rugby Football Union general manager Richard Reid
described it as "very unfortunate" and said the issue of
security processes would be included in a general review of
the test match.
The union provided the security as part of its contract with
the New Zealand Rugby Union to host the test in Dunedin, he
said.
Before the match it was agreed with RWC organisers that the
RWC security company, ADT Armourguard, would operate under
RWC rules, as a practice run for the upcoming tournament.
He did not know what specific rules the security company
followed in determining what was a weapon, but would be
surprised if an insulin pen was considered one.
ADT Armourguard referred all queries to Mr Reid.
The Chisholms' experience was "very odd", Mr Reid said.
He hoped guards would check with superiors when a ticket
holder said a needle was for insulin, and he was concerned
security staff appeared to be advising people they did not
need insulin because it was available on the grounds.
"Clearly, these things are never deliberate.
"We don't set out to deliberately upset people, but from time
to time we do have issues with people working at games and we
apologise about that."
If the Chisholms wanted to contact him, the union was more
than happy to have them as its guests at next month's
Otago-Southland game, he said.
NZRU's general manager of public affairs, Nick Brown, said it
was not the union's policy to stop people taking insulin pens
to games.
A RWC spokesman said this appeared to be a case of an
"over-zealous individual" trying to do the right thing, but
getting it wrong.
The health and safety of all its fans was a priority for
Rugby New Zealand Ltd, and certainly people who needed
medication with them at all times should be able to take it
into the ground, he said.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.