STV or FPP? That was
the question for Dunedin city councillors at a committee
meeting yesterday and they answered by carrying a motion to
retain the single transferable vote system.
The Local Government Act 2001 required the council to make a
decision by September 12, if it wanted to change the
electoral system before the 2010 council election.
Yesterday, councillors voted 6-4 in favour of the single
transferable vote (STV) electoral system, which had been in
place since 2004, over returning to the first past the post
(FPP) system.
"It is good to see democracy in action," University of Otago
senior political studies lecturer Dr Janine Hayward said.
Dr Hayward had prepared a report on local government
electoral options on behalf of the Department of Internal
Affairs aimed at helping councils reach a decision on which
electoral system to use.
Cr John Bezett said there was still confusion over STV and "I
think we should consider going back to FPP".
Cr Dave Cull disagreed, saying the public had voted for STV
in 2003 and, despite a decline in voting turnout, a return to
FPP would not change numbers at the polling booth.
Cr Bill Acklin said FPP worked in favour of incumbents and
STV "worked in favour of newcomers", a claim backed by Cr
Teresa Stevenson.
"We are starting to see a change under STV and I think that
is healthy," she said.
Councillors Chris Staynes, Andrew Noone, Fliss Butcher, Colin
Weatherall, Stevenson, Cull and Acklin voted in favour of the
motion to retain the STV system, with Michael Guest, Bezett,
Neil Collins and Richard Walls voting against.
Apologies had been received from councillors Syd Brown, Paul
Hudson, Kate Wilson and Mayor Peter Chin.
FPP had been used by the DCC and the Otago District Health
Board in the past.
The Otago Regional Council still uses the FPP system.
In 2004, Dunedin was one of 10 local authorities to adopt
STV, along with all district health boards.
The decision is to be ratified by a full council meeting.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.