Fears for campus life

Otago University Students' Association administration vice-president Brad Russell (standing, at left) and association welfare officer Shonelle Eastwood (beside him) take part in a protest yesterday over proposed voluntary student membership legislation. Photo by Linda Robertson.
Otago University Students' Association administration vice-president Brad Russell (standing, at left) and association welfare officer Shonelle Eastwood (beside him) take part in a protest yesterday over proposed voluntary student membership legislation. Photo by Linda Robertson.
Controversial legislation to cut mandatory membership of student associations could harm Dunedin's tertiary education industry and damage many university campuses, Green Party tertiary spokesman Gareth Hughes warns.

Mr Hughes, a Wellington-based list MP, addressed an Otago University Students' Association rally attended by more than 40 people outside the University Union building yesterday.

Protesters burned an effigy symbolising the proposed voluntary student membership (VSM) legislation and braved an occasional heavy downpour.

Mr Hughes urged students to help make VSM a general election issue. He said Tertiary Education Minister Steven Joyce deserved a failing grade for the way he had dealt with the matter.

In a later interview, Mr Hughes said the advent of VSM had damaged campus life in Australia. VSM was also likely to damage student life at Otago, and if that made the campus less attractive to the university's many out-of-town students, Dunedin's tertiary education industry could also be harmed.

The rally was part of a nationally co-ordinated effort from the New Zealand Union of Students' Associations yesterday with associations elsewhere also voicing opposition to Act New Zealand's Freedom of Association Bill.

The Bill is expected to have its final reading in Parliament tomorrow, effectively marking the end of compulsory membership of student associations.

Associations face a major drop in income when membership becomes voluntary, a move which is also expected to threaten the provision of some student services and campus facilities.

Auckland University Students' Association president Joe McCrory said about 500 students attended a rally at 1pm.

About 250 students went on to occupy the top floor of the Owen G. Glenn Building on campus.

After five hours of being holed up, the group marched to the Auckland Central Police Station after one of the protesters, Marcus Coverdale, was arrested for trespassing. After chanting outside the station in front of about 25 officers who blocked entry, the protesters retreated.

A statement from the vice-chancellor's office early last evening said about 60 protesters had barricaded themselves inside Auckland's Business School. They left the building at 6pm.

'Only those who use the services pay' is too simple

"Only those who use the services pay" is too simple; in the real world it doesn't work like that sv3nn0.

It's not just the salient services you can charge for that are the benefits of an association, but also the collective benefits that can only be delivered universally; eg the creation of anti-harassment practices and procedure, fair and transparent marking practices, exam-free days between exams, etc (and if we look back historically fighting things like rules against mixed-gender flatting); plus smaller things like clocks or hot water on campuses, student discounts around the city, etc. These things benefit all members and could not be practically be offered only to association members or charged directly for, thus it's only fair all students make a contribution towards them. And they still will under VSM at campuses where the institution wants the services to remain.

The only difference being students will have no say in what these services are and how these services are run - looking forward to the VC's string quartet for orientation anyone? Can you imagine the University allowing students to protest against unfair fee increases? Do you really want your student advocate who is helping you with a case against the University to be a University employee instead of a student employee? 

VSM has been a failure in Australia to the point where they are in the process of undoing it. I'm somewhat stunned how easily ACT has influenced National to change the current law which has been a generally workable compromise position for all parties. 

O Week

I think O week will be how OUSA can get people to join - if they want the sweet stuff they have to join the union. Those who don't want the union don't have to, so only those who use the services pay.

That's exactly right

That's exactly right Gregglles, at least where the university wants to retain those services. 

VSM will effectively mean that students will no longer have any say over how much those fees are, or what they're spent on.

It's started already with another article here where the University has said VSM is an oppertunity to move Orientation in line with what it wants (ie rather than what students want). 

Also, the cost will likely be higher in return for less services for the simple fact that the University will have to pay properly to run the services, whereas the students' association runs them with a lot of volunteer labour. 

More than a valid point

Who's going to fund o-week in the future, when the OUSA simply doesn't have the funds? I would hope that the university will step in and fill the gap, but they'll have to charge extra to do that. VSM just means that rather than paying their own self goverened organisation, students will end up paying the university to do the same things.

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
CSTM PrintDunedinPrinters
Kiwis NestDunedinBackpackers
Kolor Ka PaintersBalcluthaPaint & Panel
Green Street Early Childhood CentreMosgielChildcare & Kindergartens