11.9% rates rise threat spurs DCC action

Athol StephensDunedin City Council budgets are again under the microscope, as staff seek to bridge a looming shortfall threatening to push up rates by 11.9% next year.

The council's senior management team has been holding a series of meetings with activity managers across the organisation this week, to scrutinise initial financial projections for the 2012-13 year.

The discussions came as council finance and corporate support general manager Athol Stephens yesterday confirmed the council, in effect, faced an 11.9% rates increase next year.

That was if a $5 million annual shortfall in dividend payments from Dunedin City Holdings Ltd - revealed earlier this year - was not addressed by savings in other areas, he said.

The council had included a 7.4% draft rates increase for 2012-13 in this year's annual plan projections, but the DCHL shortfall would in effect push that forecast up to 11.9%, if left unchecked, he said.

However, councillors had already directed staff to find savings and achieve a "much reduced" rates increase, he said.

Dunedin Mayor Dave Cull could not be reached for comment yesterday, and Mr Stephens could not say exactly what that figure might be ahead of debate by councillors.

However, he expected it was "probably" going to be "somewhere less than 7.4%".

"That's a real challenge, there's no question about that."

Just how those savings would be achieved was yet to be confirmed, but staff had already made 106 suggestions following a request earlier this year, Mr Stephens said.

The specific suggestions remained confidential, but included changes to capital spending, corporate and activity costs, he said.

"Some were do-able and some were not. We're really now getting down to the nitty-gritty of what offerings genuinely have legs."

This week's meetings were an annual process in preparation for plan hearings each January, but the DCHL shortfall created extra pressure this year, Mr Stephens said.

Councillors had already decided on some cost-saving initiatives this year, including changes to the Logan Park redevelopment and seal extension plans, as well as possibly shaving $3 million from the Otago Settlers Museum upgrade.

They have also been investigating two options for a council-controlled organisation for water that could save at least $1.7 million a year, or increase dividends to the council by up to $5 million a year - a claim yet to be tested by the council's working party.

Council chief executive Paul Orders also announced restructuring of the council's executive management team earlier this month, aimed at streamlining the organisation and saving money.

The move has already resulted in council customer services general manager Grant Strang opting for voluntary redundancy, amid suggestions more changes could follow.

Yesterday, Mr Orders said this week's meetings were a "critical part" of the budget process, but staff had not been given a specific savings target.

All options remained on the table, including changes to council capital project plans, operating costs and service levels, he confirmed.

One-off savings could be important, but the council also needed "a savings mindset ...

driven throughout the organisation".

Mr Stephens said results of the budgeting process would be given to councillors before next year's annual plan and long-term plan deliberations, beginning in January.

chris.morris@odt.co.nz

 

Cost-cutting DCC

The problem identified:  Overspending by council on a programme of too many non-essential projects.  The resulting mess may well lead to the sale of city assets built up over many decades and increases in council service costs as a result.  Many have prodicted such a possible outcome. 

Important issues: Are the new CEO and mayor of this council now on the right track? Is this council still spending beyond its means?  The CEO is saying more savings need to be found and has pointed to restructuring and more accountablity?

Does this council still have future dreams of grandeur the city now can not now afford?  Are councillors elected to this council from the previous council still backing over spending policy? 

As a ratepayer, the answers to these questions hopfully will be made clear and help when voting to elect our next council. 

Maintaining our infrastructure

Dear Russ and Bev, the DCC is not maintaining our infrastructure. The main water drain connected with the Caversham Tunnel has not been enlarged since it was put in in 1939. Since then a huge amount of subdivision has gone on. Storm water and sewage from the Kaikorai Valley mains diverted through the tunnel to add the the pressure on them. All this after about 1962 when changes were made to the spouting water collection as the sewage couldn't handle it. Didn't the Clark Government tell councils that money was to be put aside for essential service upgrades ? Where is this money now or has the DCC just diverted it to other things? Do the essentials and toss the wish list- not down the toilet as that is full of dribble coming from the DCC- at Mayor Cull's back door. We want some action on Middle Beach, drains and infrastructure. Cut directors' salaries if they can't perform.

Suggestion

The sensible suggestion was made, some years ago: don't build a new stadium, we cannot afford it.  Those chickens are coming home to roost.

The second sensible suggestion is made now: stop using our money to borrow more money to spend on things we do not need. 

$4.5 million for the Settlers Museum, $3.2 million for one year operating DVML.  There's your 7.4% rates rise right there.  $15 million Logan Park redevelopment?  There's two years of rates rises right there.

Hand-wringing about having to make hard decisions without actually making hard decisions will not wash.

DCC rates

Here we go again. The same people happy to criticise the council without making any sensible suggestions. If the council had not asked all departments for some cost saving ideas you would still not be happy.

Already suggestions of changes to the Settlers Museum redevelopment contract and the way our waste and water systems are run are designed to save the City money but the same people don't seem to like these ideas either.

I cannot afford a increase either, but look at the size of the rates in some of our smaller neighbouring towns with considerably less facilities. Much higher.

 

Rates justification

Why, oh why, is there no cost-cutting of DCC costs based on zero-budgeting? Every DCC department should be forced to justify why they exist and why they do not have to begin their budget from a zero base every year. I have been waiting for weeks for a response from the DCC reporting how the Chinese Garden is running against its near million dollar budget. Ditto the visitor centre. Both of these departments are grossly over-staffed and over-budgeted. [Abridged]

Rates rises

So it's time for the annual soften-up of ratepayers.  Scare them with a nearly 12% increase and then say we have cut this & that and now rates will rise by only 8% or whatever they come up with. Council needs more than a microscope for the budgets.  Go through them line by line and delete and say no. This council seems as profligate as the last. The mantra :spend, spend, spend.

Bye Bye Dunedin

29% increase in rates plus paying for water and waste water basically means that I will no longer be able to afford to keep my own home anymore. That is a shame after working my backside off all these years to pay it off. The only option I have left is to pack up and move as far away as possible from the likes of the DCC. 

Chickens back to roost

Incredible in this piece softening us up for a 12% rate increase along with the prospect of paying for our water and waste water under the guise of "savings" that there's not one word on where the bulk of the spending has happened.

But we all know of course. Farry's folly, or Chin's chamber, will be a permanent reminder that this city that could ill-afford anything other than maintaining our infrastructure chose instead to build something which will be a constant drain on our future.

Savings

For those of you playing at home, $1 million is roughly 1% on the rates. So the difference between 11.9% and 7.4% is the $4.5 million voted on for the Settlers Museum final stage.  Among other things.

Fiscal discipline means not spending money that you don't have on things that you don't need.  Hand-wringing after the fact is not good enough. 

Things don't add up

11.9%? Not really. It's 11.9% plus we're going to have to pay this year's 7.4% raise again as well - and you can't just add rates rises together, they compound like the interest on a bad mortgage. They need to be multiplied. Last year, this year and next year we will have rates rises of 7.7%, 7.4% and 11.9%, if we just added them up we'd be paying 27% - in reality it's 29%.

29% is of course insane - who's had a 30% pay rise over the past 3 years? (other than maybe  the 1% tartan mafia). Certainly not elderly home owners on fixed incomes. A rates rise that's the same as inflation is to be expected but over the past years rates have been creeping up far faster than inflation, for every year that rates go up at a faster rate than inflation there should be a year it drops. It's time rates went down for a few years- let's change this 12% rates rise to a 12% rates decrease to compensate for the past few years.

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Estelle FlowersDunedinFlorists
Nomad SafarisQueenstownSightseeing
Queenstown GymQueenstownHealth & Fitness Centres
Yes Photo & DigitalWanakaPhotographers