Economy blamed for council's fall in favour

The economic downturn can take some of the blame for a drop in public satisfaction with the work of the Dunedin City Council, Mayor Dave Cull says.

The council yesterday unveiled the results of the 2012 residents' opinion survey, which asked 4500 residents for their views on the council and the city and attracted 780 responses.

The results showed overall public satisfaction with the council was down 7 percentage points from last year, to 39%, while overall dissatisfaction was up 9 percentage points, to 26%.

The longer-term trend - stretching back to 2006 - remained flat, and this year's results still represented an improvement on two years ago, when the percentage of dissatisfied people (38%) outweighed those who were satisfied (35%).

However, some of this year's biggest individual drops in satisfaction levels were found in economic areas, the results showed.

That included satisfaction with the council's efforts to attract new businesses and jobs (20%, down 6 percentage points), support for the development of businesses and jobs (26%, down 6 percentage points), and perceptions of Dunedin as a thriving city (24%, down 5 percentage points).

The need to attract more businesses also topped a list of items respondents wanted to change in Dunedin, while encouraging business and economic development came third in a top-five list of priorities for the coming year.

The council last year released figures showing 186 companies had received council grants worth more than $2.36 million since 2005, resulting in 416 new jobs and $44 million in sales.

Mr Cull yesterday told media the latest survey results reflected the state of the economy nationwide as much as the council's efforts, and the results would be mirrored in other council surveys across New Zealand.

He also believed the results underscored the need to work harder to communicate with the community the council's "value proposition" - what residents got for their rates.

"The value proposition from councils, in terms of what they provide the community and at what cost, I believe is not appreciated."

Council chief executive Paul Orders said the results also underscored the motives behind the new economic development strategy adopted by the council - and its partners - last month.

A "key rationale" for the strategy was an acknowledgement there was room for improvement, and it was now just starting to be rolled out, he said.

The survey, run annually since 1994, was conducted again this year by Christchurch company Research First, and also included a separate online survey - for comparison - which attracted 119 responses.

Results of the postal survey showed the city's facilities continued to score well. Dunedin Botanic Garden, city libraries and Otago Museum all scored more than 90% satisfaction, and the Edgar Centre - in 15th place - scored 80%.

The Forsyth Barr Stadium, featuring for the first time, scored 69% - 4% higher than the last mark for Carisbrook.

Contact with community board members (47%, up 12%), perceptions of Dunedin as a safe city (49%, up 8%) and kerbside recycling (88%, up 7%) were all big improvers, followed by contact with councillors and Mr Cull (45%, up 5%) in seventh place.

The look and feel of the South Dunedin retail area (16%, up 2%) again attracted the lowest satisfaction score. Processing building consent applications (24%, down 1%) and the suitability of roads for cyclists (25%, down 1%) also recorded low scores.

The biggest declines were recorded in the look and feel of the most convenient retail centre (62%, down 7%), followed by the overall quality of information held by the council (49%, down 7%) and the condition of footpaths (50%, down 7%).

Mr Cull believed the overall results were "pretty steady", and he was pleased the numbers reflected work in key areas, including efforts to improve contact between ratepayers and elected representatives.

Carl Davidson, of Research First, said the economic context for this year's survey was clear in the results, but residents still seemed generally satisfied.

"These aren't rock-star results, but these are definitely rock-solid results."

chris.morris@odt.co.nz

Staying away from the stadium

Well that study puts pay to the idea that we're all racing down to the stadium - if you actually ask people it seems that only 30% of us have been to the rugby stadium in the past year, the rest are staying away. Mind you that 30% have been an average 10 times - each and every one of those times subsidised by the other 70% - rugby fans with jobs having their tickets partly paid for by little old ladies on fixed incomes who can't afford to go out.

It's obvious now that the bulk of us here in Dunedin are staying away from the stadium. it's time that the city stopped subsidising professional sport. It's an entertainment  business, and it's time for it to do what every other entertainment business has to do - charge high enough ticket prices to pay their rent.

Let's ask some architects

Many people are concerned about the proposed new hotel because it is basically a very tall glass and steel tower block. It should, we are told, be long and low and more in keeping with Dunedin's older buildings. One comment even suggested that we should have something like London's Savoy.

This is all very well but it seems a bit pie in the sky. It would be really helpful if the ODT could talk to some of the city's architects to find out if these alternatives are feasible. Are large plots of land available near the harbour? Is it much more expensive to build a long low building than a tall one? Would it be much more expensive to build something that was less of a glass box? Would these alternatives function better or worse as hotels?

Melbourne-style

There are few people saying they don't want a hotel, but plenty saying they don't want such a daft design. Melbourne is flat - a completely different kettle of fish.

I love Dunedin but...

I've been here all my life and live very easy but I am starting to become disillusioned with Dunedin.
First of all, everyone always says "where's the jobs?" but no one wants a hotel built that could provide jobs and benefit tourism.
The height is well below the limits of Melbourne CBD, but they managed to balance the heritage with the new there.
We also say we are a proud heritage city yet the old Dragon Cafe and old Go-Cart buildings look horrible.
The second thing is that the stadium is a great asset. Yes, rugby is great, but it could still be filled so many more times with other events - not just sport.

The economy?

Oh wow, so now it's the economy's fault.

I don't think so Dave

I would think it has more to do with the fact that council continues to ignore what the people are saying. On at least two occasions (stadium and early settlers museum) the people were asked their opinion and both times council went against the majority opinion. Did you really expect us to be happy with that?

Satisfaction with council down

Just read today's ODT re parking enforcement at Queen Mary Maternity. What a way to welcome new Dunedinites by hitting their parents with fines!

No surprise low satisfaction with attracting new business to Dunedin with a council unfriendly to business. Those businesses that have not already left can only be described as stubborn.

My own business does 80% of its work outside Dunedin and continues to get a hard time from council. Not sure why we stay even though we employ Dunedinites and buy local - no thanks to council. [abridged]

 

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Corporate ConsumablesDunedinBusiness Services
Plunket Car Seat RentalsDunedinBaby & Nursery
Albatross InnDunedinHotels
Wedgerwood Joinery LtdAlexandraSpecialist Trades