Opponents of testing party pills on animals are
essentially advocating for a return to the medical Middle Ages,
Dunedin toxicologist Dr Leo Schep says.
Dr Schep, who is based at the National Poisons Centre, is
frustrated by the outcry over the revelation party pills
could be tested on animals as part of new legislation to
mandate their safety.
The proposal sparked outrage from the SPCA and others. Dr
Schep said pharmaceutical guidelines had to be followed if
some products were to be deemed safe, and that meant animal
"We're dealing with the safety of human beings here."
He did not accept a distinction between drugs for
recreational and therapeutic purposes, saying the safety
issues were identical.
"It does not matter that it's recreational. You have to
follow [pharmaceutical] guidelines."
Drug testing underpinned modern medicine, and prevented
repeating tragedies such as thalidomide, he said.
"Otherwise take all the drugs off the shelves and go back to
the Middle Ages."
He did not believe in animal testing for cosmetic products.
Humans using party pill products now were the "guinea pigs",
and were suffering effects such as seizures and psychosis.
"This has to stop."
The Government's "novel" approach to regulating the industry
relied on a proper testing regime.
Dr Schep said the animal testing opponents did not seem to
see the "great irony" of the fact they were most likely users
of pharmaceutical products.
While another synthetic cannabis product ban, of K2, takes
effect on Thursday, new chemical forms constantly emerging
stymied regulators' efforts to keep up, he said.
Associate Health Minister Peter Dunne has emphasised no
decision has been made on animal drug testing yet.