Second weigh bridge considered

Dunedin city councillors will consider the option of installing a weighbridge at the Green Island landfill to more accurately charge each person for the amount of rubbish they want to dump.

Other councils around the country commonly use weighbridges, with charges ranging from about $118 a tonne for general waste and $54 a tonne for green waste in Wellington to $231 a tonne and $92 a tonne for green waste in Christchurch.

Other councils have a single charge that covers both general and green waste.

Council solid waste manager Ian Featherston said staff had investigated the cost of installing a second weighbridge.

A weighbridge is already in operation for commercial users and large truckloads of waste, although user charges would only be worked out if councillors decided to go with a weighbridge.

Many landfill users have complained about the cost since a fee increase and since booth operators' ability to use their discretion was removed last year.

Operators recently started charging by vehicle size or trailer-load, instead of by what amount of rubbish was being dumped.

Cr Andrew Noone said he felt a weighbridge was the best way to go, for fairness and efficiency of the operation.

However, it would depend on the cost of installing it and how long it would take to pay it off.

''I really feel we have no choice. It's only a matter of time; we've got to have one.

''Economically, if the payback period is over a relatively short period of time it is something we should at least consider anyway.''

Cr Kate Wilson said she would rather see people reusing or recycling more of their waste than the council having to invest in a weighbridge.

A weighbridge would remove all the anomalies that could deter people from recycling or disposing of their waste sensibly, but it depended on the cost, Dunedin Mayor Dave Cull said.

Well said, BMC

I have only one vehicle.  Sometimes I took rubbish to the tip and the booth attendant looked in and I explained that This and This were in transit to elsewhere, not being thrown out, all I wanted to dump was This wool-bale of stuff and these bags, and he charged accordingly.  He was allowed to use his brain, something that is a foreign concept to Council, perhaps projecting their own confusion when required to do so.  It worked and it was fair.  What does it cost out of that "profit" to pick up the trash dumped by people who can't, or won't, give in to this new money-grab?  Show voters no respect except fine words before the election and they'll give it back with interest.  "When the council disrespects and exploits us, we'll protest even if it means disrespecting our own countryside."  Moral of the story: you can push people so far, then watch out!

Typical council thinking

So, after stopping staff using their discretion over what to charge for waste disposal. A system that should be noted, was working and making a profit. Council now want to blow more money on a weigh bridge to fix a problem they have created by forcing the staff to charge by the vehicle and not by the amount of waste being dumped. Clearly there are still some people at the council that just don't realise things have changed. You can not just throw more money at things and hope it will fix your poor decision making.

Heres an idea, why not just just admit you stuffed up and revert back to the old system?

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Print It WanakaWanakaPrinters
Martinovich Exceptional JewelleryWanakaJewellers
Glendale Retirement HomeDunedinRetirement & Rest Homes
David Latta BuildersBalcluthaBuilders