Dunedin City Councillors have been told a review of Forsyth Barr Stadium operations will take time. Photo by Stephen Jaquiery.
The Dunedin City Council's top-to-bottom review of the
Forsyth Barr Stadium operation could take longer than first
thought, chief executive Dr Sue Bidrose says.
However, the review has already been expanded to include
reconsidering whether the stadium should be paying its full
share of rates, two years after the company running it was
granted a discount worth nearly $2 million a year.
Debate over the review emerged again yesterday, as
councillors signed off their 2014-15 draft budget, before
public consultation beginning in March.
The hearing had begun with last week's shock announcement Dr
Bidrose had launched a fundamental review of the stadium's
operating model, faced with year-on-year losses by the
company tasked with running it.
Councillors endorsed that move yesterday, while noting any
implications for the coming year's budget would be reported
back before the document came into force on July 1.
However, final results of the wide-ranging review could take
longer and Dr Bidrose told councillors it was important to
get it right.
''This is not a once-over-lightly ... I do need to be sure
that that is done right, rather than done quickly,'' she
She would have a better idea of progress once the review was
in full swing, but emails were already coming in offering
advice about alternative funding models, she said.
''Until we really get this thing halfway under our belt, we
are not really sure how long it will take,'' she said.
She was still aiming for results by mid-year, but would
inform councillors in due course if the review required more
The update came after council financial planner Carolyn
Howard indicated reconsidering the stadium's rates bill would
also form part of the review.
That was prompted by Cr Lee Vandervis, who called for an end
to the rates subsidy granted to Dunedin Venues Management Ltd
The 2010 decision had cut DVML's rates bill by 93%, from
nearly $2 million to a more manageable $134,000 a year, later
adjusted for inflation.
The discount meant the council received the same rates as it
would have from properties previously occupying the stadium
site, but also avoided ''distorting'' the rating system for
other properties or the demand for extra council funding.
While the company would not be able to afford the increase,
the subsidy should end - with council providing more funding
- to provide a clearer financial picture, Cr Vandervis
''That would be a much more honest way of actually funding
the stadium,'' he said.
However, council financial planner Carolyn Howard cautioned
the move would have a ''significant impact'' on the council's
budget, while Cr Richard Thomson said it would also push up