A final decision on AgResearch's plan to slash jobs at
Invermay will be made in ''the next couple of months''.
After repeatedly declining to say when a decision would be
made, an AgResearch spokesman said in a statement yesterday
it would confirm its plans ''in the next couple of months to
enable the design phase to commence''.
''However, we do not have a definitive date yet,'' the
''If there are changes, we will let our staff know first, and
we will then be in contact with our stakeholders.''
AgResearch did not comment on specific staff who had left
because of the plan, but knew ''the changes we are making are
challenging for many of our staff, and we are taking their
concerns very seriously''.
Former Dunedin North MP Pete Hodgson said finally getting a
timeline on AgResearch's plan was good news for the prospects
of saving Invermay jobs.
''The fact that they are proposing a decision time is really
encouraging and the fact they are hinting at the possibility
of [making changes] is also encouraging.
''I think there might be some change afoot,'' he said.
It was now important AgResearch made the right decision,
which meant fully reversing its plan to slash jobs at
Invermay as recommended by its own change management team.
Having a timeline also meant it was more important than ever
for those against the plan to speak up, he said.
This meant signing the petition against slashing Invermay
jobs and getting in touch with Government ministers.
It was especially important for farmers to make their
position, whether it for or against, known to AgResearch and
AgResearch made the statement over a final decision in
response to questions about the revival of a vote of no
confidence in its board and management, which was left to lie
on the table at a meeting in Gore last month.
Southern Texel Breeders chairman and meeting organiser Hugh
Gardyne said the motion was being revived because AgResearch
had ignored its concerns, including that
scientists would quit rather than shift and over the loss
science capability in the South.
AgResearch's disregard of the concerns raised at the meeting
was typical of its ''blind adherence'' to its restructuring
process, ''almost ignoring anyone that disagrees with them'',
whether farmers or current and former AgResearch staff.
The revived motion would be emailed to those who attended the
meeting and a result is likely to be released soon after.