In an
11th-hour bid to derail Otago stadium construction plans, the
Stop the Stadium group late yesterday sought a High Court
injunction barring the Dunedin City Council from next week
signing a construction contract.
The council was expected to sign the contract at an
extraordinary meeting on Monday morning, but the group says
the financial parameters of the project have changed so much
the council should be restrained from signing until it has
consulted afresh with ratepayers.
The court action has thrown plans for Monday's meeting into
disarray. Council chief executive Jim Harland last night said
the city solicitors, Anderson Lloyd Lawyers, would examine
the papers in detail at the weekend and would brief
councillors about options at the start of the meeting. The
briefing would be confidential.
Asked how long the briefing might take, Mr Harland said he
did not know. Nor did he know whether the council would be
able to debate signing the stadium construction contract.
The court action had come as a surprise, Mr Harland said. He
said he rang the city solicitor at 5.03pm and was told no
papers had been filed with the court. Not long afterwards, he
was told that had changed.
"I'm disappointed . . . it has come so late. I understand
people have concerns [about the stadium] and have the right
to exercise their legal rights. But happening at the end of
the business day before the meeting makes it awkward for
everyone."
Some councillors might read about the pending legal action in
the Otago Daily Times, Mr Harland said.
"I'm emailing them all tonight, but I can't guarantee they
will read it before the morning," he said.
Stop the Stadium president Bev Butler said last night the
paperwork was filed with the court about 4.30pm.
As well as the main document, there were supporting
affidavits from herself and accountant and university
lecturer Nicola Holman.
Ms Butler said the documents were filed upon their
completion.
The group was waiting to hear what the response would be from
the council.
If the matter proceeded to a hearing, Ms Butler expected it
might be a week before it would be heard in the High Court at
Dunedin.
The council has up to 25 days (from yesterday) to file its
statement of defence.
In her affidavit supporting the review application and
interim injunction, Ms Butler gave the background of Stop the
Stadium's opposition to the stadium and outlined her concerns
about lack of consultation.
Ms Holman's affidavit concentrated on the financial aspects
of the stadium proposal.
She considered changes made to the long-term council
community plan to be both material and significant in terms
of generally accepted accounting practices and that the
stadium represented in the long-term plan draft was not
substantially the same as that in the current annual plan.
The application document listed the differences as the $10
million increase in the cost of the project, the $3 million
reduction in the contribution from the Community Trust of
Otago, the "external contribution" of $15 million being
recorded without explanation of its source, the $22.8 million
increase in the bridging loan requirement, a budget based on
$165.4 million in construction costs not previously specified
and private funding of $45.5 million, which had changed
significantly.
Costs
I can't wait till the courts throw this out, and order costs against STS. I think about $10 million ought to cover it.
Leaving it to the last minute is just petty and wrong. If you thought you had a valid case you would have filed weeks ago.
Grim contest, indeed
What an indictment on the way our city is being run, when a group of concerned citizens, which arguably represents majority public sentiment, has to resort to an injunction in order to redirect the Council's focus back towards the vital activities which seem to occupy less and less of its time and energies.
Injunction
After reading the editorial in Saturday's paper, it seems the one-sided view of the ODT has changed and there appears to be a more prudent approach to this very expensive experiment, the Wow of the Dunedin. Congratulations to the editor since this is a reflection of some consideration that has gone into it. The only thing is, there will be no guarantee of filling the stadium if it is going to be built and the decision to proceed will undoubtedly be creating a big financial burden for all of Dunedin. It can not be compared to the Moana Pool or the Library or the Sewerage System for the Peninsula, as was suggested.
congratulations
Thanks to everyone at Stop The Stadium - hopefully the high court will see the financial suicide of this rugby pitch idea. I think we should all give our rates to help the costs for the hearing thank you Bev and team ....
High Court injunction - thank God
Good work STS committee. It's just a pity private citizens have to spend so much money to force their elected representatives to listen to them - and even then all we might get is Clayton's listening. But this does give councillors another couple of months to come to their senses.
New stadium injunction?
If it wasn't for these opponents holding up the process at every corner the costs would not have gone up so much and the stadium would be probably be on the go right now. So now they want it to go to the High Court which is going to add to the cost even more.