Artificial turf could replace grass playing fields

Dunedin City Council sports fields facilities officer Harold Driver displays a sample of artificial turf, which could be used to ease weather problems at grounds such as the Oval (pictured). Photo by Stephen Jaquiery.
Dunedin City Council sports fields facilities officer Harold Driver displays a sample of artificial turf, which could be used to ease weather problems at grounds such as the Oval (pictured). Photo by Stephen Jaquiery.
The days of dirty knees and mud puddles on Dunedin's sports fields could be numbered, as the Dunedin City Council considers a switch to artificial turf.

Council staff confirmed this week they were considering using artificial playing fields at grounds such as Logan Park or the Oval, as an alternative to grass rugby and football fields.

Some of the city's grass fields were prone to flooding in winter, which this year has seen the cancellation of 371 junior, secondary school and senior football and rugby fixtures.

Council community and recreation services general manager Mick Reece said a switch to artificial turf could lead to sports being played on fewer fields, freeing up other fields for other recreational uses.

The artificial surfaces would cost up to $900,000 each to install, but would ease weather disruption and save the council money in the long term, by reducing the $2 million each year spent maintaining 52 rugby and 54 football fields.

An example was Otago Hockey's success in using two artificial playing surfaces at the McMillan Centre, at Logan Park, instead of up to 15 grass playing fields, Mr Reece said.

"Once you have got an artificial field, like hockey has already proved, you can go 24/7. That's a huge advantage," he said.

Council sport fields facilities officer Harold Driver had inspected two artificial turf rugby fields at the College Rifles rugby club during a trip to Auckland last month, and a briefing on artificial turf technology - organised by the council - was also held in Dunedin last month.

Mr Reece said any change was likely to be several years away, following talks with clubs and other groups and consultation through the annual plan process, but there appeared to be "huge advantages".

"It's consistent, it's reliable and it's not weather-dependent . . . it has to be part of our planning for the future. It's part of the thinking now."

Otago Hockey chief executive Chris Aubin said he supported the move, as the installation of two artificial fields at the McMillan Centre had been "in a word, brilliant".

The new surfaces allowed for constant use - restricted only by a 10pm limit on the centre's floodlights - and the council would save money in the longer term, he said. The turf could be replaced every 12 years for less than half the installation cost.

Club rugby and football players desperate for dry practice pitches during May had also used the McMillan Centre for training this winter, demonstrating their durability, he said.

However, University A coach John Leslie - who earlier this month criticised the council for closing grounds because of wet weather - was more cautious.

Replacement?

Artificial turf needs replacement every few years. The above costings don't seem to consider this in their claim that maintenance will be cheaper.

Parking

I'm sure it would be cheaper to put down asphalt than artificial turf. Why would they put down 900k of turf then let cars rip it up? Anyway, it's not mentioned that it is specifically for Logan Park. It's for a number of sites around Dunedin including the Oval.

and looking at the money ...

If you look at the actual costs it seems a bit iffy - if I read the article correctly it costs up to $900k for each artificial surface. Say we assume that 'up to' means that on average each playing field will cost 2/3 of that: $600k - then for the 52 rugby and 54 soccer fields mentioned it will cost something like $63.6m to install - and will save $2m per year. If the artificial turf lasts 30 years or more we'll be ahead on the game. I'm just playing with numbers here - could be the article is less than precise about the true costs and I'm sure that the DCC will go out and consult with all of the community, not just the rugby hierarchy before spending that much money right?

More parking ....

A friend pointed out last night that she thought the real reason for wanting to replace the grass at Logan Park is because the DCC has finally realised that the stadium has no real parking for patrons available (less now that students have been pushed into the area by the recent parking changes), and the city doesn't have enough buses to keep normal services running at the same time and to bring people to the stadium.

As a result she thinks they've decided that Logan Park will make a great parking lot

Yes

Seems no-one else is, so happy to answer, Max. As the documentation shows,"reinforced turf" (which is used at Eden Park, although I am not certain whether just for the shaded areas or the entire playing field) was a prime consideration for laying in the new stadium but was taken out following the successful trials at growing natural turf under the EFTE test rig.
The cost of the 'reinforced turf' was budgeted at $900,000. It remains in the contingencies in the overall budget.
"Reinforced turf" is not anything like 100% artificial turf often referred to by the brand name 'Astroturf'. Nor the artificial surface used for the hockey fields at the McMillan Centre. I have never heard of anything other than "reinforced turf" being spoken of around council circles for possible use on Dunedin sportsgrounds.
I am told that it is increasingly being used in the cooler climates of the USA where the overall trend is away from 100% artificial turf where it exists back to "grass". I stand to be corrected, but as I see it and to paraphrase the late Walter Cronkite, "That's the way the grass is tonight'.

maths ....

The article says it costs $2m/year to maintain the existing grass playing fields - over 10 years that would be $20m - the stadium's going to cost $340m, more once all the bills for things like moving sh88 come in. Last time I checked $340m is a lot more than $20m.

Artificial turf and the stadium

I am sure games will move to the stadium, for example regular club rugby fixtures as well as Chatham Cup matches. They regularly play at Carisbrook as it is.
I, however, have a comment worthy of being published. Can anyone tell me why we can't have this surface in the new stadium? I am also surprised that no one has noticed the fact that our existing sports grounds cost a lot more more to maintain than the stadium will cost.
In fact, over a 10 year period they cost more than the whole stadium. Should we just do away with them as only a small percentage of people play sports? That would save rate payers up to $66 per year?

Artificial grass - you gotta be kidding?

I don't believe it, another hair brained scheme from the DCC. Having an indoor field with real grass (Carisbrook) and an outdoor stadium with artificial grass.
I wonder if the DCC is pricing in a security fence to stop the artificial grass getting stolen. I reckon a couple hundred student flats would look good with artificial grass in every room for floor coverings.
And what goes under the grass? gravel? concrete? who knows? An increase in sports injuries. I say leave the fields as they are and give the health service a break. A cancelled game means less injuries.

Save money

All of these sports should move to Dunedin's premier new indoor venue - the Otago Stadium - when it becomes available in the next couple of years. After all, it is supposed to be a multi-purpose community venue, isn't it?

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Sunbright Lighting Southern RegionDunedin
Richard Hudson KindergartenDunedinChildcare & Kindergartens
Crimpers SalonMosgielHairdressers
The PC MechanicQueenstownComputer Services