City should 'underwrite Aust flights'

If Dunedin wanted transtasman flights reinstated then the community would need to underwrite any losses, Air New Zealand chief executive Rob Fyfe said.

Responding to criticism from a Dunedin-based traveller over the airline's decision to fly seasonally rather than year-round across the Tasman, Mr Fyfe said in an email the city should follow Rotorua's example.

Rotorua, where transtasman flights are scheduled to start from December, had made a "financial contribution to the service to help ensure its success", he said.

"If the Dunedin community wanted to have a similar discussion with us about underwriting the cost of any losses Air New Zealand would make operating a year-round service, we would be happy to have that discussion - but to date we have not been given that indication."

Mr Fyfe said it cost $100 million each week to operate the airline and it had little choice but to withdraw loss-making services rather than put the airline "at risk".

Attempts to contact Mr Fyfe for clarification were unsuccessful.

However, an Air New Zealand spokesman said Mr Fyfe was overseas and "would not breach the trust and privacy by referring to private correspondence between himself and a Dunedin resident without their permission to do so".

In response to questions from the ODT, the airline wrote a letter to the editor from group general manager short-haul airlines Bruce Parton, which reiterated much of what Mr Fyfe disclosed.

"Dunedin already has transtasman services which are sustainable on a seasonal basis, but to increase again to year-round in the current environment would require a sharing of the financial risk if they were to continue and be operated at a loss.

"We are happy to have that discussion with Dunedin leaders, but to date we have not been given that indication and, at this point, continue to work with the Project Gateway team to market Dunedin in Australia," he said.

City leaders say they have not been approached to share the financial risk of transtasman flights.

Dunedin Mayor Peter Chin said the city had supported the airline "from day one" - mainly in the form of marketing - but was unlikely to underwrite non-performing routes.

Dunedin International Airport chief executive John McCall said the airport regularly met Air New Zealand staff as part of Project Gateway to "grow the market", but discussions over the underwriting of flights had never been raised.

"At the end of the day, if the service can't stack up without a subsidy, then they are doomed to fail."

Underwriting flights would not be fair to ratepayers, or to Air New Zealand rival Pacific Blue, which was to begin transtasman flights from the airport next month, he said.

Otago Chamber of Commerce chief executive John Christie said underwriting flights was an option "worth exploring" and could be driven by local businesses rather than ratepayers.

A Rotorua Airport spokeswoman said "collaboration" between the airline and industry was in place, but she declined to say whether flights were underwritten.

Aviation Industry Association chief executive Irene King said it was likely transtasman flights to Rotorua were underwritten, which was part of "a global phenomenon on marginal routes".

Civic leaders would need to weigh up the cost benefit of "sharing the risk" on underperforming routes in order to create wealth and jobs, she said.

Air New Zealand announced in April it would reduce transtasman services from Dunedin to operate on a seasonal basis.

hamish.mcneilly@odt.co.nz

 

Underwriting flights

Well... Air NZ forced poor Kiwi Air out when they gave it an honest go. Air NZ's only reason for operating in Dunedin is to keep out the competition - once the competition is gone, AirNZ reduces service ... again.
Maybe we should consider Rob F's statement but not with Air NZ as a previous comment. As the tax payer we've helped you (Air NZ) out enough

Why airport should stay where it is

While JezWelly seems to think that Dunedin's airport could and should be located much closer to the central city, I beg to differ.
I fully agree that it would be preferable for the airport to be located closer to the CBD — and it would also be preferable for it to be located on land that is not given to being flooded from time to time. However, if people want an airport that is suitable for use by contemporary jets, then aeronautical considerations rule out the location of any site that is closer to the CBD than Momona.
Attempting to relocate Dunedin's airport to the harbour would have the serious drawback of severely restricting which types of aircraft would be able to use it. I believe that a good case could be made that Wellington's interests have been significantly compromised by the location of its airport at Rongotai, as the restricted length of its runway means that Boeing 747s and the larger Airbus aircraft are unable to safely depart from or even land there.
While I don't think that it would be a good idea for the DCC to underwrite trans-Tasman flights, perhaps there could be a case for bus services to be provided between the city and airport, and for such services to be regarded and treated as suburban services. Even though travelling times between the city and airport would not be reduced by the provision of such services, perhaps they could still reduce the negative perceptions associated with the airport's location — by the provision of a cheaper option for travelling to or from the airport.

Subsidising Air NZ

If the peace and quiet of my harbour-side home is going to be disturbed by more than 53ton trucks and 2000ton trains I would prefer it to be done by the hum of wind generators rather than the roar of the jet engine. They would also benefit the city and the country by providing energy a short way from the user with minimum line losses.

Airport location

I don't think we need to relocate the airport. Compared to other cites' airports it's a really easy & quick journey from airport to city. Also if we bring it closer there are issues of noise pollution over residential areas. And think of the city centre traffic if there was an airport close. The city centre has to close roads as it is if there are a couple of buses from the cruise ships.

Ungrateful Air NZ

I do believe we as the taxpayer bailed out Air NZ (about $750 million I believe). What do they give us in return? Cheap fares, good service, food to eat on their planes - ummmm, no to all. Dunedin seems to be forgoten by them. Shame on Air NZ

Underwriting flights?

The issue with regard to Dunedin Airports inability to make flights to Australia viable and increase its capacity of seats to other New Zealand cities, I believe is due to the position of the current airport. It's so far away from the city and makes a weekend trip to Dunedin prohibitive as you pay more for the road trip from the airport to the city compared to the actual flight. If the Dunedin City Council wanted to do something for the city that would have increased tourism and economic activity it should have spent money on relocating the airport. Maybe reclaiming some of the harbour for a runway... radical idea but would have had huge ongoing economic benefit to the city compared to the stadium.

Underwriting ....

If there's a need to underwrite flights then someone needs to make a real business case for it - and then we can have the Chamber of Commerce come up with a way so that their members who will benefit from the extra tourists can pay for it - it's good to see them standing up and taking some responsibility.
There's no need for the city to get into the underwriting business - certainly not for Dunedin to Gold Coast flights - our tourism will almost certainly do better with direct flights to Sydney.

hmmmm ....

maybe we need a competing rugby union too .... one that doesn't periodically use the council to rifle through our wallets.

Competition the key - to improve poor service & scheduling

I totally agree with the 'house' post we really need competition here. It would be better to spend any Dunedin contribution on helping to bring in a rival company rather than giving to a company that has already let Dunedin down. I have to travel to Sydney regularly on business and the Air New Zealand service and scheduling is woeful.
At present to fly Sydney to Dunedin in the week takes 12 hrs via Wellington, at weekend its closer to 20hrs via Auckland. This is certainly not encouraging business to Dunedin.
On my last flight out of Dunedin I waited over an hour in the queue for 90 odd people to be processed by one person. On finally reaching check in I was scolded for checking in late by the tired and frustrated lady on the desk. Air NZ is not a shadow on Freedom Air.

Underwritting flights?

Well I suppose the DCC has set a precedent in a way by underwritting a non performing rugby union so anything is possible in regard to flights. Seriously, why Air NZ thinks it can hold a gun to the head of a city like Dunedin just shows that more competition is needed. Roll on Pacific Blue and Jet Star.

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Wood SolutionsDunedinSpecialist Trades
Wanaka FlightseeingWanakaHelicopter & Aeroplane Flights
Hayward McAuslan & Co. Chartered AccountantsBalcluthaAccountants
C Hughes and Associates LtdCromwellSurveyors