In his 1939 essay, The Farmer as a Conservationist,
the noted ecologist Aldo Leopold wrote: "The landscape of any
farm is the farmer's portrait of himself. Conservation
implies self-expression of that landscape, rather than blind
compliance with economic dogma."
The New Zealand farmer is, for better or worse, inextricably
woven into the fabric of the landscape - a landscape that is
often the reflection of generations of farmers working in
concert with the ecological processes and biota upon which
production depends.
While economic motivations often dominate farm management,
many farmers consider themselves stewards of their lands and
all of the non-production plant and animal species on them.
New Zealand is unique among industrialised countries in that
farmers receive no subsidies to support conservation measures
on their lands, and that nearly all efforts to enhance and
conserve non-production species are undertaken at the
farmers' own expense.
Because farmers must engage in conservation of their own
volition, they may regard themselves as having a vested
interest in supporting non-production ecology, and may
consequently have a greater motivation to be innovative in
developing conservation strategies.
Along these lines, Leopold wrote: "Subsidies and propaganda
may evoke a farmer's acquiescence, but only enthusiasm and
affection will evoke his skill."
I argue that this enthusiasm and affection is something that
characterises many New Zealand farmers and, importantly,
distinguishes them from their counterparts abroad.
Yet, New Zealand agricultural landscapes are far from Edens
of biodiversity. Indeed, there is a dire need to restore and
enhance biodiversity on production lands throughout New
Zealand.
So what can and should we expect farmers to accomplish with
regard to conservation in agricultural landscapes?
Many of us who experience nature intermittently through
controlled encounters in national parks, where wildlife
remains in its most unadulterated state, may place
unrealistic expectations on farmers to engage in conservation
efforts on their farms.
The result is a widening of the already great farmer-townie
rift. Do farmers have a responsibility to protect and enhance
non-production species on their lands? Absolutely. Something
that perhaps warrants a bit more attention is the degree to
which wider New Zealand should be held accountable for
supporting farmers in such endeavours.
In addition to aesthetic or intrinsic value, biodiversity
provides ecosystem services, such as nutrient cycling,
pollination and pest control, which confer benefits to the
broader landscape in addition to supporting production.
This results in a more robust landscape that is better able
to accommodate environmental stress and disturbance beyond
just the farm scale.
Leopold wrote: "Conservation is harmony between men and land.
When land does well by the owner, the owner does well by his
land; when both end up better by reason of the partnership,
we have conservation. When one or the other grows poorer, we
do not."
I propose that the wider public is also a critical component
of this covenant. When a farm is biodiverse and resilient,
the ecology of the farm benefits, the farmer benefits through
enhanced production and, ultimately, the New Zealand economy
and landscape benefit.
Whether calling for conservation support in the form of
subsidies or council grants, the public also has a
responsibility to support conservation of biodiversity
outside of protected areas. Regardless of the mechanism
through which conservation occurs, it is critical that both
farmers and the public enter into this conversation.
The real challenge will be to restore biodiversity to the
areas most greatly impacted by human activities and,
therefore, those in greatest need of conservation.
Only when all New Zealanders, farmers and public alike,
support conservation across all landscapes can New Zealand
truly consider itself a leader in environmentalism and
conservation.
• Sarah Meadows recently completed her PhD in zoology at
the University of Otago, where her research took a
transdisciplinary look at the ecological and social processes
that affect non-production biodiversity on pastoral farms.
She works as a research assistant at the Centre for the Study
of Food, Agriculture and Environment.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.