Prior to 1987, most Crown-owned land in New Zealand was
managed by the Lands and Survey Department (L&S).
In 1987, L&S was restructured into the Department of
Conservation (Doc), Landcorp and Forestcorp. Most of the
commercial-minded senior management people went to Landcorp
and Forestcorp.
Doc gained practical hands-on field staff, but many of their
management people took a very idealistic view that they would
save the environment and could do it alone.
Of course DOC is not adequately resourced to sustainably
manage the 35% or so of New Zealand that it is responsible
for, but that did not stop it spending considerable resources
in advocating how other landowners should manage their land.
This regularly brought it into conflict with local
communities. A particular point of conflict was that crown
land was not bound to the same standards of weed and pest
control as were adjoining landowners.
However, attitudes and policies are changing. Doc is taking a
less aggressive role in advocacy on lands of other tenures,
leaving this role to the many lobby groups, which is more
properly where it should lie.
Government has decided that Crown-owned land must adapt a
good neighbour policy, which means that at least across
boundaries crown agencies must manage weeds and pests to the
standards that regional pest management strategies require.
Doc is recognising that it cannot do it all itself and is
increasingly working in with local communities and
landowners. There are many people out there keen to help.
In discussion with Paul Hellebrekers, Wanaka field centre
manager, I understand the field centre has at least 17 formal
management agreements or memorandums of understanding.
These cover aspects such as the very successful agreement to
manage New Zealand Alpine Club-owned huts in the West
Matukituki, relocation of robins to the West Matukituki, buff
weka to the lake islands, restoration of vegetation and
facilities on Mou Whau Island to predator trapping at
Makarora and Rocky Hill.
As well, there are many informal agreements with adjoining
landowners covering pest control and access.
In the past, Doc has been extremely conservative and
stereotyped in management techniques. However, this is also
changing.
DOC and Scion together have done excellent work on developing
chemical mixtures and application methods to control wilding
conifers. This was an area of badly needed research.
In 2006, when I first became involved in the Mid Dome Wilding
Tree Trust all parties threw up their hands in horror at my
suggestion that we consider fire as a management tool.
However, they are now considering fire as a management tool
and supporting two trials on adjoining farmland.
I have long felt that Doc needed to work more collaboratively
with local communities and be more innovative in management
to achieve best results. The fact that this is happening is
very positive. Fundamental to this is the building of trust.
Trust takes time to build and can be destroyed overnight, so
needs to be worked on continuously.
New Zealand farmers are among the most adaptable in the
world, largely because we are innovative and flexible in our
on-farm management and learn from each other and science.
Where we also co-operate in marketing, as in dairy, we are
very strong. Where we do not co-operate, as in wool, we are
weak.
The same broad principles apply to conservation management.
- John Aspinall
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.