Fonterra said it would have preferred a public recall of milk
powder that killed two babies in China earlier but its joint
venture partner Shijiazhuang Sanlu Group Co Ltd had to abide
by Chinese rules.
The New Zealand dairy giant said someone put the banned
chemical melamine into raw milk supplied to Sanlu. The
possibility of contamination during the production, storage
and sales process has been excluded. Melamine can boost the
apparent protein content in some standard tests on food.
Fonterra said it was too early to speculate about
compensation for the victims of "this tremendously tragic
issue".
"In this case we frankly have sabotage of a product," said
chief executive Andrew Ferrier.
"Our hearts go out to the parents and the infants who were
affected."
A second infant death was reported today, bringing to two the
number of babies killed in an expanding scandal that drew an
official product recall only after New Zealand officials blew
the whistle.
The latest death is in Gansu province, the official Xinhua
news agency reported.
The Sanlu board, which has three Fonterra directors, was
first advised on August 2 that there was a problem with the
contamination of infant formula. A trade recall was begun on
that day and a public recall a week ago. The Chinese
government is now recalling all Sanlu products.
The process and investigation was being handled by the
Chinese Ministry of Health, Mr Ferrier said.
"We together with Sanlu have done everything that we possibly
could to get the product off the shelf," Mr Ferrier said.
On a conference call he was repeatedly asked why Fonterra did
not go public itself earlier and he replied that it would
have been irresponsible for Sanlu not to have followed the
guidelines of Chinese authorities. Fonterra has a 43 percent
stake in Sanlu.
"I can look myself in the mirror and say Fonterra acted
absolutely responsibly in this one. If you don't follow the
rules of an individual market place then I think you are
getting irresponsible.
"We as a minority shareholder had to continue to push Sanlu.
Sanlu had to work with their own government to follow the
procedures that they were given," he said.
The Green Party is questioning why Fonterra did not go
public. Prime Minister Helen Clark said Fonterra had pushed
for a full recall at the earliest possible opportunity but
had been blocked by Chinese local government officials.
She said Fonterra approached the New Zealand Government with
its concerns. New Zealand then sent Ambassador Tony Brown to
make representations about concerns and the national Chinese
government acted fast.
"We were the whistleblowers and they leapt in and ensured
there was action on the ground."
Miss Clark said the first she knew about the issue was on
September 5 and after a meeting on Monday September 8
officials were instructed to send Mr Brown. The New Zealand
Food Safety Authority called other international partners to
seek advice.
Miss Clark said the first indication the embassy in China got
about the problem was August 14 but it did not have to report
to head office.
She did not think the case would impact on the New Zealand
brand but said Kiwi companies like Fonterra needed to be sure
good processes would be followed in joint ventures.
Mr Ferrier said Sanlu was buying raw milk from people "who
were putting what appears to be melamine in the milk".
Sanlu purchases raw milk from third parties. "We don't know
how widespread that is at this point of time," he said.
Mr Ferrier declined to speculate on whether he or others at
Fonterra should resign.
"The issue here is, yes, babies have died and we are totally
focused on just managing through this process. I'm not here
on a head hunting expedition."
Fonterra had "a couple of people" who worked at Sanlu.
He said "don't speculate on stuff like this" to a question as
to whether the timing of the Olympics was a factor in the
handling of the issue.
He said those detained in China were from third parties from
further down the supply chain and were not Sanlu employees.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.