Police have warned parents not to be fooled into thinking
airguns they give their children are toys.
The warning came several weeks after an undercover police
officer was shot dead in Auckland with a high-powered air
rifle and as the government moved to tighten the law on
airguns.
Police national manager of firearms licensing and vetting,
Inspector Joe Green, said up to 100,000 airguns were in the
country which were replicas of real firearms, including
rifles and pistols.
He said it was often very difficult to tell the difference
between real weapons and replicas.
At least one person had been shot dead in New Zealand by
police after he brandished a replica Glock pistol at police
and police feared it could happen again unless people knew
the risk.
"We have produced information for parents because the major
supplier of these things as far as we can work out, to
children and young people who play up with them, are their
parent and caregivers who don't realise they are an air gun."
However, he said parents and caregivers who unlawfully
supplied airguns to young people were seldom charged.
The Mountain Safety Council, which had an advisory committee
on firearms safety, had recommended the government treat
firearm replicas as if they were real weapons such as
pistols, restricted weapons or as military style
semi-automatics.
He said after shotguns and rifles, replica firearms were the
third most common item seized by police.
The Arms Amendment Bill tightening control of airguns was
before Parliament but Mr Green said it was not certain when
it would become law.
In the latest issue of the Police Association magazine,
Police News, editor Steve Plowman
said in a tragic incident in America last year, a 12-year-old
boy who refused to stop for police was shot dead by police
who believed he was carrying a gun.
He said in firearms incidents police could not afford to be
tentative as a split-second hesitation could cost them their
life or the life of a colleague.
He said one armed offenders squad member had told him any
fake weapon which had a striking resemblance to a real weapon
should be banned.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.