A complaint against a nationwide glass repair company has
been upheld after the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA)
ruled its advertisements for windscreen repairs were
misleading.
The complaint referred to four radio advertisements for Smith
& Smith, all of which presented the point that once a
windscreen chip became a crack people would have to replace
their entire screen.
The complainant, D Hore of Crack Specialists Ltd, said the
advertisements were incorrect as standards allowed glaziers
to repair cracks up to 350mm outside the critical vision
area.
Smith & Smith responded to the complaint saying while the
standard did allow for the repairs, it did not repair cracks
larger than a 50 cent coin for quality reasons.
The company said upon receiving the complaint one of the four
advertisements was discontinued, although it argued this was
a conservative step and it did not accept the advertisement
was misleading, nor were the remaining three.
In its deliberation, the complaints board said consumers
listening to the advertisements would understand "crack" to
refer to any size crack, and therefore that any crack would
require the wind screen to be replaced.
It ruled that the four advertisements breached the
advertising ethics of truthful presentation and upheld the
complaint.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.