School violence blamed on corporal punishment removal

A big increase in the number of primary school children suspended for violent acts is being blamed on the removal of corporal punishment in schools.

Figures from the Ministry of Education show a 88 percent increase in suspensions of eight-year-olds from 2000 to 2008 for assaults on classmates, a 73 percent rise for seven-year-olds, a 70 percent increase for six--year-olds while the suspensions over the same period had increased by 33 percent for five-year-olds.

"It is significant that as schools have removed corporal punishment, schools have become more violent," Family First national director Bob McCoskrie said today.

"School yard bullying by pupils on other pupils and staff is now the new form of `corporal punishment' in schools.

"We have a generation of children who have been victims of a social experiment of how best to raise our kids and the role of correction.

"And it continues with the smacking debate -- another example of undermining parental authority and `state knows best how to raise your kids'."

Mr McCroskie said student behaviour would continue to deteriorate "for as long as we tell them that their rights are more important than their responsibilities".

Auckland Primary Principals Association president Marilyn Gwilliam said schools were struggling to handle the children because by law, they were not allowed to touch children to calm them down, even when they "kick and they bite and they hit."

In many cases, schools had no choice but to stand children down, she told The Weekend Herald.

The Post Primary Teachers Association is set to discuss solutions to combating the schoolyard violence at its annual meeting next month.

Because of schools limited number of in-school counsellors and teacher aides, the association's advisory group on conduct problems will suggest that schools need access to trained psychologists and social workers.

Problems in schools: an SES problem?

Corporal Punishment in schools was banned in 1989. Education Amendment Act 1989. This article mentions an increase in school violence starting in 2000. How about telling us the stats from 1989 to 2000. If violence fell during that time or remained flat, wouldn't that put the lie to McCoskrie's argument?People like Bob McCoskrie seem to have a one-size-fits-all approach to dealing with problems: beat it out of them. While he bleats his familiar tune, I would like further information.Are these violence problems more evident in low decile schools? Please provide a chart showing the contrast between low-decile and high-decile schools. If there is a big difference, and both schools do not use corporal punishment, it is clear that corporal punishment is not what fixes the problem.Let's get the whole picture. Get the demographics of the kids using violence. Ethnicity, nationality, family income, religion, disability, marital status of parents, domestic violence at home, alcohol problems at home. I want it all, so we can see what differences make a difference. If kids using violence are the ones with most problems, how does it solve things to add violent punishment to their heap of woes?Let's be scientific about it (unlike Bob McCoskrie) and ask questions. Only then can we begin to explore appropriate solutions.

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Rare to Recent DVD's & BooksDunedinRecreational Activities
Pest-Gone ServicesDunedinAnimal Specialists
Blue TwistDunedinWeb Design & Development
Steve Morris JoineryBalcluthaSpecialist Trades